Optimization of computer software settings improves accuracy of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis macrorestriction fragment pattern analysis

被引:40
作者
Duck, WM
Steward, CD
Banerjee, SN
McGowan, JE
Tenover, FC
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Healthcare Qual Promot, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.41.7.3035-3042.2003
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Computer-assisted analysis of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) libraries can facilitate comparisons of fragment patterns present on multiple gels. We evaluated the ability of the Advanced Analysis (version 4.01) and Database (version 1.12) modules of the Phoretix gel analysis software package (Nonlinear USA, Inc., Durham, N.C.) to accurately match DNA fragment patterns. Two gels containing 38 lanes of SmaI-digested Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF DNA were analyzed to assess the impact of (i) varying the lane position of the standards, (ii) using gel plugs made at different times, and (iii) normalizing the fragment patterns by using molecular weight (MW) algorithms versus retardation factor (R-f) algorithms. Two sets of PFGE libraries (one containing SmaI restriction patterns from 62 Enterococcus faecium isolates and the other containing SmaI restriction patterns of 89 Staphylococcus aureus isolates) were analyzed to assess the impact of varying the matching tolerance algorithm (designated as the vector box setting [VBS]) in the Phoretix software. Varying the lane position of standards on a gel and using gel plugs made on different days resulted in different VBSs, although it was not possible to judge whether those differences were statistically significant. Normalization of E. faecalis OG1RF fragment patterns by Rf and MW methodology yielded no statistically significant differences in variability between the same fragment on different lanes. Suboptimal VBSs decreased the specificity with which related isolates were grouped together in dendrograms. The optimal VBS for analysis of PFGE fragment patterns from E. faecalis isolates differed from that for S. aureus isolates and sometimes was not that recommended by the manufacturer. Thus, computer-assisted analysis of PFGE patterns seemed to compensate for the intra- and intergel variation evaluated in the present study, and optimizing the software for the species to be tested was a critical preliminary step before further PFGE library analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:3035 / 3042
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, PULSED FIELD GEL ELE, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-101290-8.50002-X
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1983, Statistical methods
[3]   Antimicrobial resistance in isolates from inpatients and outpatients in the united states: Increasing importance of the intensive care unit [J].
Archibald, L ;
Phillips, L ;
Monnet, D ;
McGowan, JE ;
Tenover, F ;
Gaynes, R .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1997, 24 (02) :211-215
[4]   Multicenter comparison of three different analytical systems for evaluation of DNA banding patterns from Cryptococcus neoformans [J].
Cardinali, G ;
Martini, A ;
Preziosi, R ;
Bistoni, F ;
Baldelli, F .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (06) :2095-2100
[5]   Molecular typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis:: Comparison of results obtained in a multilaboratory effort using identical protocols and MRSA strains [J].
Chung, M ;
De Lencastre, H ;
Matthews, P ;
Tomasz, A ;
Adamsson, I ;
De Sousa, MA ;
Camou, T ;
Cocuzza, C ;
Corso, A ;
Couto, I ;
Dominguez, A ;
Gniadkowski, M ;
Goering, R ;
Gomes, A ;
Kikuchi, K ;
Marchese, A ;
Mato, R ;
Melter, O ;
Oliveira, D ;
Palacio, R ;
Sá-Leao, R ;
Sanches, IS ;
Song, JH ;
Tassios, PT ;
Villari, P .
MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE-MECHANISMS EPIDEMIOLOGY AND DISEASE, 2000, 6 (03) :189-198
[6]  
Facklam R.R.S., 1999, Manual of Clinical Microbiology, P297
[7]   Surveillance of antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in United States hospitals: Project ICARE phase 2 [J].
Fridkin, SK ;
Steward, CD ;
Edwards, JR ;
Pryor, ER ;
McGowan, JE ;
Archibald, LK ;
Gaynes, RP ;
Tenover, FC .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1999, 29 (02) :245-252
[8]   Computerized analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns: Comparative evaluation of two commercial software packages [J].
Gerner-Smidt, P ;
Graves, LM ;
Hunter, S ;
Swaminathan, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 36 (05) :1318-1323
[9]   COMPARISON OF RIBOTYPING AND PULSED-FIELD GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS FOR SUBSPECIES DIFFERENTIATION OF STRAINS OF ENTEROCOCCUS-FAECALIS [J].
GORDILLO, ME ;
SINGH, KV ;
MURRAY, BE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 31 (06) :1570-1574
[10]  
Kloos W.E., 1999, Manual of Clinical Microbiology, P264