Intra-articular ropivacaine 0.75% and bupivacaine 0.50% for analgesia after arthroscopic knee surgery: a randomized prospective study

被引:42
作者
Marret, E
Gentili, M
Bonnet, MP
Bonnet, F
机构
[1] Hop Tenon, Assistance Publ Hosp, Serv Anesthesie Reanimat, F-75970 Paris, France
[2] St Vincents Clin, St Gregoire, France
关键词
ropivacaine; bupivacaine; intra-articular administration; arthroscopic meniscus repair;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2004.11.005
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Intra-articular administration of local anesthetic solution provides analgesia after arthroscopic knee surgery. Bupivacaine is considered the gold standard local anesthetic in this indication, but ropivacaine, which is less toxic than bupivacaine, can consequently be administered in higher doses, potentially increasing the duration of analgesia. We compared the analgesic effect of intraarticular injection of ropivacaine 225 mg and bupivacaine 150 mg in patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery. Type of Study: Double-blind, randomized prospective clinical study. Methods: The study included 45 patients scheduled for knee meniscus repair under arthroscopy, who were allocated randomly into 3 groups to receive, intra-articularly, 30 mL of isotonic saline, bupivacaine 0.5 %, or ropivacaine 0.75 % solutions at the end of surgery. Postoperatively, pain was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and on mobilization. Propacetamol was given when patients complained of pain. Results: VAS scores at rest. and on mobilization were higher in the saline group compared with the ropivacaine group (P = .006 and P = .01, respectively). No difference in VAS scores was documented between bupivacaine and the saline groups. The median delay between the intra-articular administration and propacetamol administration was shorter in the saline group (15 minutes; range, 15 to 120 minutes) compared with the ropivacaine group (240 minutes; range 15 to 720 minutes) but no difference was documented between the bupivacaine group (30 minutes; range, 15 to 360 minutes) and the other 2 groups. Conclusions: This level I study documents that intra-articular ropivacaine 0.75 % provides better analgesia than bupivacaine 0.5 % after knee arthroscopic surgery. Level of Evidence: Level I.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 316
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
CEDERHOLM I, 1992, REGION ANESTH, V17, P322
[2]   Efficacy and uptake of ropivacaine and bupivacaine after single intra-articular injection in the knee joint [J].
Convery, PN ;
Milligan, KR ;
Quinn, P ;
Sjövall, J ;
Gustafsson, U .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 87 (04) :570-576
[3]   Comparison of morphine and ropivacaine following knee arthroscopy [J].
Franceschi, F ;
Rizzello, G ;
Cataldo, R ;
Denaro, V .
ARTHROSCOPY, 2001, 17 (05) :477-480
[4]  
Johansson B, 1997, EUR J SURG, V163, P371
[5]   Possible bupivacaine toxicity after intraarticular injection for postarthroscopic analgesia of the knee: Implications of the surgical procedure [J].
Liguori, GA ;
Chimento, GF ;
Borow, L ;
Figgie, M .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 94 (04) :1010-1013
[6]   A systematic review of intra-articular local anesthesia for postoperative pain relief after arthroscopic knee surgery [J].
Moiniche, S ;
Mikkelsen, S ;
Wetterslev, J ;
Dahl, JB .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 1999, 24 (05) :430-437
[7]   Pain relief by wound infiltration with bupivacaine or high-dose ropivacaine after inguinal hernia repair [J].
Pettersson, N ;
Berggren, P ;
Larsson, M ;
Westman, B ;
Hahn, RG .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 1999, 24 (06) :569-575
[8]   Diclofenac premedication but not intra-articular ropivacaine alleviates pain following day-case knee arthroscopy [J].
Rautoma, P ;
Santanen, U ;
Avela, R ;
Luurila, H ;
Perhoniemi, V ;
Erkola, O .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2000, 47 (03) :220-224
[9]  
SULLIVAN SG, 1994, ANESTH ANALG, V79, P591
[10]   The effect of tourniquet release time on the analgesic efficacy of intraarticular morphine after arthroscopic knee surgery [J].
Whitford, A ;
Healy, M ;
Joshi, GP ;
McCarroll, SM ;
OBrien, TM .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (04) :791-793