The application of characteristic scores and scales to the evaluation and ranking of scientific journals

被引:44
作者
Glaenzel, Wolfgang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr R&D Monitoring ECOOM, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Hungarian Acad Sci, Inst Res Policy Studies, Budapest, Hungary
关键词
citation impact; journal impact; journal ranking; normalisation; CITATION IMPACT; SCIENCE FIELDS; INDICATORS; INDEX;
D O I
10.1177/0165551510392316
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Characteristic scores and scales (CSS) were introduced by Glanzel and Schubert in 1988. CSS can be applied to analyse the citation impact of any subset of a system in comparison with citation patterns of the complete system. In this present study, CSS will be applied to individual subfields as systems and journals and papers as corresponding subunits. CSS are used as parameter-free tools to identify top journals within science fields, to identify highly cited papers within fields and journals and to compare the rank frequency distribution of highly cited papers over journals with the journal ranking according to traditional impact measures. The second part of the study is devoted to the possible normalisation of journal impact. In this study, threshold values of CSS are used to re-scale the journal-impact distributions. The underlying methodology and the outcomes for different subfields representing the life sciences, engineering and mathematics are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 48
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Characteristic scores and scales based on h-type indices [J].
Egghe, L. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2010, 4 (01) :14-22
[2]   Welcome to the journal of informetrics [J].
Egghe, Leo .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2007, 1 (01) :1-1
[3]   Characteristic scores and scales -: A bibliometric analysis of subject characteristics based on long-term citation observation [J].
Glaenzel, Wolfgang .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2007, 1 (01) :92-102
[4]   Subfield-specific normalized relative indicators and a new generation of relational charts: Methodological foundations illustrated on the assessment of institutional research performance [J].
Glaenzel, Wolfgang ;
Thijs, Bart ;
Schubert, Andras ;
Debackere, Koenraad .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2009, 78 (01) :165-188
[5]   Better late than never?: On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon [J].
Glänzel, W ;
Schlemmer, B ;
Thijs, B .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2003, 58 (03) :571-586
[6]   A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes [J].
Glänzel, W ;
Schubert, A .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2003, 56 (03) :357-367
[7]   CHARACTERISTIC SCORES AND SCALES IN ASSESSING CITATION IMPACT [J].
GLANZEL, W ;
SCHUBERT, A .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1988, 14 (02) :123-127
[8]   The role of the h-index and the characteristic scores and scales in testing the tail properties of scientometric distributions [J].
Glanzel, Wolfgang .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, 83 (03) :697-709
[9]   An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output [J].
Hirsch, JE .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (46) :16569-16572
[10]   On the behavior of journal impact factor rank-order distribution [J].
Mansilla, R. ;
Koppen, E. ;
Cocho, G. ;
Miramontes, P. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2007, 1 (02) :155-160