Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects

被引:1125
作者
Imai, Kosuke [1 ]
Keele, Luke [2 ]
Yamamoto, Teppei [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Polit, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Causal inference; causal mediation analysis; direct and indirect effects; linear structural equation models; sequential ignorability; unmeasured confounders; PRINCIPAL STRATIFICATION; POTENTIAL OUTCOMES; MODERATORS;
D O I
10.1214/10-STS321
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Causal mediation analysis is routinely conducted by applied researchers in a variety of disciplines. The goal of such an analysis is to investigate alternative causal mechanisms by examining the roles of intermediate variables that lie in the causal paths between the treatment and outcome variables. In this paper we first prove that under a particular version of sequential ignorability assumption, the average causal mediation effect (ACME) is nonparametrically identified. We compare our identification assumption with those proposed in the literature. Some practical implications of our identification result are also discussed. In particular, the popular estimator based on the linear structural equation model (LSEM) can be interpreted as an ACME estimator once additional parametric assumptions are made. We show that these assumptions can easily be relaxed within and outside of the LSEM framework and propose simple nonparametric estimation strategies. Second, and perhaps most importantly, we propose a new sensitivity analysis that can be easily implemented by applied researchers within the LSEM framework. Like the existing identifying assumptions, the proposed sequential ignorability assumption may be too strong in many applied settings. Thus, sensitivity analysis is essential in order to examine the robustness of empirical findings to the possible existence of an unmeasured confounder. Finally, we apply the proposed methods to a randomized experiment from political psychology. We also make easy-to-use software available to implement the proposed methods.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 71
页数:21
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Mediation analysis via potential outcomes models
    Albert, Jeffrey M.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (08) : 1282 - 1304
  • [2] Angrist JD, 1996, J AM STAT ASSOC, V91, P444, DOI 10.2307/2291629
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, P INT JOINT C ART IN
  • [4] [Anonymous], EXPT DESIGNS IDENTIF
  • [5] THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    BARON, RM
    KENNY, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) : 1173 - 1182
  • [6] ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE - ITS NATURE AND USES
    COCHRAN, WG
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1957, 13 (03) : 261 - 281
  • [7] Deaton A., 2009, Proceedings of the British Academy 2008 Lectures, V162, P123
  • [8] EGLESTON B, 2006, 113 J HOPK U DEP BIO
  • [9] Bayesian inference for causal mediation effects using principal stratification with dichotomous mediators and outcomes
    Elliott, Michael R.
    Raghunathan, Trivellore E.
    Li, Yun
    [J]. BIOSTATISTICS, 2010, 11 (02) : 353 - 372
  • [10] Mediation analysis with principal stratification
    Gallop, Robert
    Small, Dylan S.
    Lin, Julia Y.
    Elliott, Michael R.
    Joffe, Marshall
    Ten Have, Thomas R.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (07) : 1108 - 1130