Infant industry protection and industrial dynamics

被引:11
作者
Ederington, Josh [1 ]
McCalman, Phillip [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Dept Econ, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Econ, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Econ, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
GATT/WTO; Trade policy; Safeguards; TRADE; TECHNOLOGY; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.01.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A perennial case for industrial policy is based on the protection of young or emerging industries. Despite a natural association with concepts of life cycles, industrial policy has not been analyzed in the context of an industry life-cycle model. In particular, an important life-cycle characteristic, the potential for very large changes in the rate of net entry, is ignored. In this paper, we demonstrate how the impact of industrial policy depends critically on the entry and exit dynamics within an industry. We construct a model of technology adoption in which the number of firms is endogenous, and derive a set of novel predictions about the effects of protection on firm technology decisions. Specifically, we show that permanent protection can induce earlier adoption, but also decreases the probability that a given firm adopts the new technology. Likewise, we demonstrate that reducing the duration of protection results in faster adoption than permanent protection, but also reduces a given firm's probability of adoption. Finally, we show that, for industries characterized by flexibility in firm numbers, protection does not change the rate of technology adoption but does increase the size and probability of a shakeout (large scale net exit). (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 47
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   THE SENSITIVITY OF STRATEGIC AND CORRECTIVE R-AND-D POLICY IN BATTLES FOR MONOPOLY [J].
BAGWELL, K ;
STAIGER, RW .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1992, 33 (04) :795-816
[2]   Plants and productivity in international trade [J].
Bernard, AB ;
Eaton, J ;
Jensen, JB ;
Kortum, S .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (04) :1268-1290
[3]  
Bown Chad P., 2005, WORLD TRADE ORG LEGA
[4]   Do safeguard tariffs and antidumping duties open or close technology gaps? [J].
Crowley, MA .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 68 (02) :469-484
[5]   Endogenous firm heterogeneity and the dynamics of trade liberalization [J].
Ederington, Josh ;
McCalman, Phillip .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 74 (02) :422-440
[6]   INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL DYNAMICS [J].
Ederington, Josh ;
McCalman, Phillip .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 50 (03) :961-989
[7]  
Ederington Josh, 2007, IMPACT TRADE LIBERAL
[8]   PREEMPTION AND RENT EQUALIZATION IN THE ADOPTION OF NEW TECHNOLOGY [J].
FUDENBERG, D ;
TIROLE, J .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1985, 52 (03) :383-401
[9]   TIME PATHS IN THE DIFFUSION OF PRODUCT INNOVATIONS [J].
GORT, M ;
KLEPPER, S .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1982, 92 (367) :630-653
[10]   Monopolistic competition and the diffusion of new technology [J].
Götz, G .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1999, 30 (04) :679-693