Patients' assessment and recall of surgical information after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

被引:49
作者
Kriwanek, S
Armbruster, C
Beckerhinn, P
Blauensteier, W
Gschwantler, M
机构
[1] Rudolfstiftung Hosp, Dept Surg 1, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
[2] Rudolfstiftung Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
关键词
surgical information; informed consent; laparoscopic cholecystectomy;
D O I
10.1159/000018675
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: While patients' needs for adequate preoperative information are generally recognized, data evaluating the effectiveness of the consultation before laparoscopic cholecystectomy have not been published until today. This prospective study was performed to investigate the success of preoperative information. Methods: A combination of oral and written information was given to all patients in two interviews. Information concentrated on indications for surgery, operative procedures, and risks. Patients were asked to answer questionnaires 5 days after the operation. Results: From January 1996 to January 1997, 200 patients were interviewed. Ninety-seven percent indicated to wish detailed information. Eighty-four percent indicated a high level of satisfaction with the presented information. While the levels of knowledge concerning indications for surgery and procedures were satisfactory in 85 and 51% respectively, only 30% were able to name at least one risk factor of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that patients' evaluation of their surgical knowledge and the process by which it was communicated to them did not correspond to their ability to recall this information after surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 673
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   INFORMED CONSENT - WHY ARE ITS GOALS IMPERFECTLY REALIZED [J].
CASSILETH, BR ;
ZUPKIS, RV ;
SUTTONSMITH, K ;
MARCH, V .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1980, 302 (16) :896-900
[2]   MECHANISMS OF MAJOR BILIARY INJURY DURING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
DAVIDOFF, AM ;
PAPPAS, TN ;
MURRAY, EA ;
HILLEREN, DJ ;
JOHNSON, RD ;
BAKER, ME ;
NEWMAN, GE ;
COTTON, PB ;
MEYERS, WC .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1992, 215 (03) :196-202
[3]   INFORMED CONSENT - THE ASSESSMENT OF 2 STRUCTURED INTERVIEW APPROACHES COMPARED TO THE CURRENT APPROACH [J].
DAWES, PJD ;
OKEEFE, L ;
ADCOCK, S .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1992, 106 (05) :420-424
[4]   COMPLICATIONS OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - A NATIONAL SURVEY OF 4,292 HOSPITALS AND AN ANALYSIS OF 77,604 CASES [J].
DEZIEL, DJ ;
MILLIKAN, KW ;
ECONOMOU, SG ;
DOOLAS, A ;
KO, ST ;
AIRAN, MC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 165 (01) :9-14
[5]   SATISFYING PATIENTS NEEDS FOR SURGICAL INFORMATION [J].
EDWARDS, MH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1990, 77 (04) :463-465
[6]   SURGICAL INFORMED CONSENT - WHAT IT IS AND IS NOT [J].
EDWARDS, WS ;
YAHNE, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 154 (06) :574-578
[7]   MALPRACTICE PREVENTION THROUGH THE SHARING OF UNCERTAINTY - INFORMED CONSENT AND THE THERAPEUTIC ALLIANCE [J].
GUTHEIL, TG ;
BURSZTAJN, H ;
BRODSKY, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 311 (01) :49-51
[8]   GALLSTONES AND LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
HALL, WH ;
GOLLAN, JL ;
BULKLEY, GB ;
DIEHL, AM ;
ELASHOFF, JD ;
FEDERLE, MP ;
HENDERSON, JM ;
HOGAN, WJ ;
KELLY, KA ;
MASSANARI, DL ;
POWELL, DW ;
RIKKERS, LF ;
SORRELL, M ;
THIEL, TK ;
WILSON, JAP .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 269 (08) :1018-1024
[9]   INFORMED CONSENT - IS IT A MYTH [J].
HERZ, DA ;
LOOMAN, JE ;
LEWIS, SK ;
STEWART, DH ;
BAGAN, M .
NEUROSURGERY, 1992, 30 (03) :453-458
[10]   PATIENTS RECALL OF PREOPERATIVE INSTRUCTION FOR INFORMED CONSENT FOR AN OPERATION [J].
HUTSON, MM ;
BLAHA, JD .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1991, 73A (02) :160-162