Sustainable manufacturing. Bibliometrics and content analysis

被引:183
作者
Bhatt, Yogesh [1 ]
Ghuman, Karminder [1 ]
Dhir, Amandeep [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Thapar Inst Engn & Technol, LM Thapar Sch Management, Dera Bassi 140507, Punjab, India
[2] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Sch Business & Management, Lappeenranta, Finland
[3] Univ Turku, Turku Sch Econ, Turku, Finland
[4] North West Univ, Optentia Res Focus Area, Potchefstroom, South Africa
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Bibliometric analysis; Content analysis; Green supply chain management (GrSCM); Environmental management practices; Sustainable manufacturing (SM); Sustainability; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; INTERNATIONAL-BUSINESS JOURNALS; HUMAN-RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; LIFE-CYCLE; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; LEAN PRODUCTION; SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY; AUTHOR COCITATION; DEVELOPMENT GOALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120988
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Businesses have practiced and examined lean and green manufacturing principles for the last 25 years, but the sustainability challenges that we face today are still significantly potent. This context creates a need to critically examine the research and practice in this domain to determine the gaps and propose solutions. To achieve that, we applied a two-tier analysis constituting bibliometric and content analyses for developing the intellectual structure of sustainable manufacturing (SM) literature. The study also produced a comprehensive framework to provide a granular understanding of SM literature. The framework demonstrates different paradigms of SM literature as well as the conceptual and methodological advancement of the research frontiers in the domain. The outcomes of the research comprise implications for researchers, managers, and policymakers. The study concludes that most empirical work focuses on the relationship of lean and green practices with organizational and environmental performance, but the role and criticality of sustainability are significantly underrepresented in SM literature. Based on our findings, we call for the integration of sustainability principles, that is, sustainable development goals (SDGs), circular economy, life cycle engineering, and corporate sustainability assessment with SM research. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 139 条
[1]   The resource-based theory: Dissemination and main trends [J].
Acedo, Francisco Jose ;
Barroso, Carmen ;
Galan, Jose Luis .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (07) :621-636
[2]   Critical success factors for lean implementation within SMEs [J].
Achanga, Pius ;
Shehab, Esam ;
Roy, Rajkumar ;
Nelder, Geoff .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2006, 17 (04) :460-471
[3]   Model of efficient and sustainable improvements in a lean production system through processes of environmental innovation [J].
Aguado, Sergio ;
Alvarez, Roberto ;
Domingo, Rosario .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 47 :141-148
[4]   Sustainable product design and development: A review of tools, applications and research prospects [J].
Ahmad, Shamraiz ;
Wong, Kuan Yew ;
Tseng, Ming Lang ;
Wong, Wai Peng .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 132 :49-61
[5]   Scheduling for sustainable manufacturing: A review [J].
Akbar, Muhammad ;
Irohara, Takashi .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 205 :866-883
[6]   Sectoral assessment of the Turkish textile industry for the diffusion of sustainable production approach [J].
Alkaya, Emrah ;
Demirer, Goksel N. .
JOURNAL OF THE TEXTILE INSTITUTE, 2015, 106 (11) :1212-1225
[7]   EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION: A 20-YEAR REVIEW OF EVOLUTION AND RECONCEPTUALISATION [J].
Almahendra, Rangga ;
Ambos, Bjorn .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 19 (01)
[8]  
[Anonymous], GLOB SUST REP
[9]  
[Anonymous], MULTIVARIATE DATA AN
[10]  
[Anonymous], P 11 GLOB C SUST MAN