Changes to the subscales of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires are proposed

被引:63
作者
de Boer, MR
de Vet, HCW
Terwee, CB
Moll, AC
Völker-Dieben, HJM
van Rens, GHMB
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Inst Res Extramural Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Elkerliek Hosp, Helmond, Netherlands
关键词
questionnaires; quality of life; visually impaired persons; factor analysis; statistical; reproducibility of results; minimally important change;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.04.007
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objective: Psychometrically sound questionnaires for the assessment of vision-related quality of life (QOL) are scarce. Therefore, the objective was to further validate two vision-related QOL questionnaires in a Dutch population of visually impaired elderly. Methods: A total of 329 visually impaired older persons referred to low vision services completed the low vision QOL (LVQOL) and Vision-Related Quality of Life Core Measure (VCM1) questionnaires at baseline, after 1-4 weeks (retest), and after 5 months. Confirmatory factor analyses were performed on baseline data. The smallest detectable change (SDC) was assessed, based on the standard error of measurement (SEM). Change scores between the baseline and 5 months follow-up data were related to a general transition question to assess the minimal important change (MIC). Furthermore, the MIC was related to the SDC, to examine whether the MICs were detectable beyond measurement error. Results: The original factor structures could not be confirmed. After omitting items and remodeling, adequate fits were obtained. SDCs comprised at least one quarter of the scale for all scales and subscales on the individual level and exceeded the MICs on every occasion. Conclusion: We propose MICs of 5-10 points for the scales and subscales of the LVQOL and VCM1. The questionnaires are not useful in the follow-up of individual patients. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1260 / 1268
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Aaronson N K, 1988, Oncology (Williston Park), V2, P69
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Health measurement scales
[3]   Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness [J].
Beckerman, H ;
Roebroeck, ME ;
Lankhorst, GJ ;
Becher, JG ;
Bezemer, PD ;
Verbeek, ALM .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (07) :571-578
[4]  
Bentler P.M., 1995, EQS WINDOWS USERS GU
[5]  
Bentler P. M., 2006, EQS 6 structural equations program manual
[6]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[7]   Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in rheumatoid arthritis joint damage of the Sharp/van der Heijde and Larsen/Scott scoring methods by clinical experts and comparison with the smallest detectable difference [J].
Bruynesteyn, K ;
van der Heijde, D ;
Boers, M ;
Saudan, A ;
Peloso, P ;
Paulus, H ;
Houben, H ;
Griffiths, B ;
Edmonds, J ;
Bresnihan, B ;
Boonen, A ;
van der Linden, S .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2002, 46 (04) :913-920
[8]   Prevalence and causes of visual impairment and blindness among 9980 Scandinavian adults - The Copenhagen City Eye Study [J].
Buch, H ;
Vinding, T ;
la Cour, M ;
Appleyard, M ;
Jensen, GB ;
Nielsen, NV .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 111 (01) :53-61
[9]   What is a clinically meaningful change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire? Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study 5592 [J].
Cella, D ;
Eton, DT ;
Fairclough, DL ;
Bonomi, P ;
Heyes, AE ;
Silberman, C ;
Wolf, MK ;
Johnson, DH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 55 (03) :285-295
[10]   Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life [J].
Crosby, RD ;
Kolotkin, RL ;
Williams, GR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (05) :395-407