Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models

被引:971
作者
Allopenna, PD [1 ]
Magnuson, JS [1 ]
Tanenhaus, MK [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jmla.1997.2558
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Eye movements to pictures of four objects on a screen were monitored as participants followed a spoken instruction to move one of the objects, e.g., "Pick up the beaker; now put it below the diamond" (Experiment 1) or heard progressively larger gates and tried to identify the referent (Experiment 2). The distractor objects included a cohort competitor with a name that began with the same onset and vowel as the name of the target object (e.g., beetle), a rhyme competitor (e.g. speaker), and an unrelated competitor (e.g., carriage). In Experiment 1, there was clear evidence for both cohort and rhyme activation as predicted by continuous mapping models such as TRACE (McClelland and Elman, 1986) and Shortlist (Norris, 1994). Additionally, the time course and probabilities of eye movements closely corresponded to response probabilities derived from TRACE simulations using the Luce choice rule (Luce, 1959). In the gating task, which emphasizes word-initial information, there was clear evidence for multiple activation of cohort members, as measured by judgments and eye movements, but no suggestion of rhyme effects. Given that the same sets of pictures were present during the gating task as in Experiment 1, we conclude that the rhyme effects in Experiment 1 were not an artifact of using a small set of visible alternatives. (C) 1998 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 439
页数:21
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] THE EFFECT OF SUBPHONETIC DIFFERENCES ON LEXICAL ACCESS
    ANDRUSKI, JE
    BLUMSTEIN, SE
    BURTON, M
    [J]. COGNITION, 1994, 52 (03) : 163 - 187
  • [2] [Anonymous], LEXICAL REPRESENTATI
  • [3] DO THE BEGINNINGS OF SPOKEN WORDS HAVE A SPECIAL STATUS IN AUDITORY WORD RECOGNITION
    CONNINE, CM
    BLASKO, DG
    TITONE, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1993, 32 (02) : 193 - 210
  • [4] CUTLER A, 1995, HDB PERCEPTION COGNI, V11, P97
  • [5] GOLDINGER SD, 1989, J MEM LANG, V28, P508
  • [6] SPOKEN WORD RECOGNITION PROCESSES AND THE GATING PARADIGM
    GROSJEAN, F
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1980, 28 (04): : 267 - 283
  • [7] Kucera F., 1967, COMPUTATIONAL ANAL P
  • [8] LUCE PA, 1990, ACL MIT NAT, P122
  • [9] Luce R.D., 1959, INDIVIDUAL CHOICE BE
  • [10] Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access
    MarslenWilson, W
    Moss, HE
    vanHalen, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1996, 22 (06) : 1376 - 1392