A perspective on trials comparing enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin in the treatment of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes

被引:8
作者
Califf, RM
Petersen, JL
Hasselblad, V
Mahaffey, KW
Ferguson, JJ
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, St Lukes Episcopal Hosp, Texas Heart Inst, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Houston, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2005.02.021
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Non-ST-elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a serious, acute illness characterized by a high rate of death and morbid events, and antithrombin therapy is integral to its management. Contemporary guidelines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association call for use of low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin (UFH). Methods A systematic overview of six randomized, controlled trials comparing enoxaparin to UFH in the treatment of NSTE ACS was performed using a random-effects empirical Bayes model. Efficacy end points-included the incidence of death or the composite of death and myocardial infarction (Ml) at 30 days. Safety end points included major bleeding and transfusion at 7 days. Results For the aggregate of 21,946 patients, the incidence of the composite of death and Ml at 30 days was lower in enoxaparin-treated patients (10.1% vs 11.0% for UFH, OR 0.91, 95% Cl 0.83-0.99, number need to treat 107). For the 9,835 patients in these trials who received no prerandomization antithrombin therapy, the composite of death and Ml at 30 days occurred in 8.0% and 9.4% of enoxaparin- and UFH-treated patients, respectively (OR 0.81, 95% Cl 0.70-0.94, number need to treat 94). There was no significant difference in the incidence of death at 30 days in either population. A nonsignificant trend toward higher rates of major bleeding was seen at 7 days for enoxaparin-treated patients, in both the overall safety population and the population of patients who did not receive antithrombin treatment before randomization, but there was no difference in blood transfusions. Conclusion In a systematic overview of six randomized, controlled trials comparing enoxaparin to UFH in the treatment of NSTE ACS in approximately 22,000 patients, the use of enoxaparin rather than UFH was associated with a modest. reduction in the incidence of the composite of death and Ml at 30 days without a significant increase in the rate of major bleeding or transfusion at 7 days.
引用
收藏
页码:S91 / S99
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Enoxaparin prevents death and cardiac ischemic events in unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction - Results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 11B trial [J].
Antman, EM ;
McCabe, CH ;
Gurfinkel, EP ;
Turpie, AGG ;
Bernink, PJLM ;
Salein, D ;
de Luna, AB ;
Fox, K ;
Lablanche, JM ;
Radley, D ;
Premmereur, J ;
Braunwald, E .
CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (15) :1593-1601
[2]   Assessment of the treatment effect of enoxaparin for unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction - TIMI 11B-ESSENCE meta-analysis [J].
Antman, EM ;
Cohen, M ;
Radley, D ;
McCabe, C ;
Rush, J ;
Premmereur, J ;
Braunwald, E .
CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (15) :1602-1608
[3]  
Antman EM, 2001, CIRCULATION, V103, P2310
[4]   Safety and efficacy of enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes who receive tirofiban and aspirin - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Blazing, MA ;
de Lemos, JA ;
White, HD ;
Fox, KAA ;
Verheugt, FWA ;
Ardissino, D ;
DiBattiste, PM ;
Palmisano, J ;
Bilheimer, DW ;
Snapinn, SA ;
Ramsey, KE ;
Gardner, LH ;
Hasselblad, V ;
Pfeffer, MA ;
Lewis, EF ;
Braunwald, E ;
Califf, RA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (01) :55-64
[5]   HEMORRHAGIC EVENTS DURING THERAPY WITH RECOMBINANT TISSUE-TYPE PLASMINOGEN-ACTIVATOR, HEPARIN, AND ASPIRIN FOR ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - RESULTS OF THE THROMBOLYSIS IN MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION (TIMI), PHASE-II TRIAL [J].
BOVILL, EG ;
TERRIN, ML ;
STUMP, DC ;
BERKE, AD ;
FREDERICK, M ;
COLLEN, D ;
FEIT, F ;
GORE, JM ;
HILLIS, LD ;
LAMBREW, CT ;
LEIBOFF, R ;
MANN, KG ;
MARKIS, JE ;
PRATT, CM ;
SHARKEY, SW ;
SOPKO, G ;
TRACY, RP ;
CHESEBRO, JH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1991, 115 (04) :256-265
[6]   A perspective on the regulation of the evaluation of new antithrombotic drugs [J].
Califf, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 82 (8B) :25P-35P
[7]   A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for unstable coronary artery disease [J].
Cohen, M ;
Demers, C ;
Gurfinkel, EP ;
Turpie, AGG ;
Fromell, GJ ;
Goodman, S ;
Langer, A ;
Califf, RM ;
Fox, KAA ;
Premmereur, J ;
Bigonzi, F .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (07) :447-452
[8]   Randomized double-blind safety study of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with tirofiban and aspirin:: The ACUTE II study [J].
Cohen, M ;
Théroux, P ;
Borzak, S ;
Frey, MJ ;
White, HD ;
Van Mieghem, W ;
Senatore, F ;
Lis, J ;
Mukherjee, R ;
Harris, K ;
Bigonzi, F .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 144 (03) :470-477
[9]   Clinical trial registration - A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [J].
DeAngelis, CD ;
Drazen, JM ;
Frizelle, FA ;
Haug, C ;
Hoey, J ;
Horton, R ;
Kotzin, S ;
Laine, C ;
Marusic, A ;
Overbeke, AJPM ;
Schroeder, TV ;
Sox, HC ;
Van der Weyden, MB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (11) :1363-1364
[10]  
Ferguson JJ, 2004, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V292, P45