Control of Drosophila paramyosin/miniparamyosin gene expression -: Differential regulatory mechanisms for muscle-specific transcription

被引:28
作者
Arredondo, JJ
Ferreres, RM
Maroto, M
Cripps, RM
Marco, R
Bernstein, SI
Cervera, M
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Med, CSIC, Dept Bioquim, E-28029 Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Med, CSIC, Inst Invest Biomed, E-28029 Madrid, Spain
[3] San Diego State Univ, Dept Biol, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[4] San Diego State Univ, Inst Mol Biol, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1074/jbc.M009302200
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
To define the transcriptional mechanisms contributing to stage- and tissue-specific expression of muscle genes, we performed transgenic analysis of Drosophila paramyosin gene regulation. This gene has two promoters, one for paramyosin and one for miniparamyosin, which are active in partially overlapping domains. Regions between -0.9 and -1.7 kilobases upstream of each initiation site contribute to the temporal and spatial expression patterns. By comparing the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis promoters, conserved binding sites were found for known myogenic factors, including one MEF2 site and three E boxes. In contrast with previous data, our experiments with the paramyosin promoter indicate that the MEF2 site is essential but not sufficient for proper paramyosin gene transcription. Mutations in the three E boxes, on the other hand, do not produce any effect in embryonic/larval muscles. Thus MEF2 site- and E box-binding proteins can play different roles in the regulation of different muscle-specific genes, For the miniparamyosin promoters, several conserved sequences were shown to correspond to functionally important regions. Our data further show that the two promoters work independently. Even when both promoters are active in the same muscle fiber, the transcription driven by one of the promoters is not affected by transcription driven by the other.
引用
收藏
页码:8278 / 8287
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Abmayr SM, 1998, CURR TOP DEV BIOL, V38, P35
[2]  
Ashburner M., 1989, DROSOPHILA LAB HDB M
[3]   TINMAN AND BAGPIPE - 2 HOMEO BOX GENES THAT DETERMINE CELL FATES IN THE DORSAL MESODERM OF DROSOPHILA [J].
AZPIAZU, N ;
FRASCH, M .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 1993, 7 (7B) :1325-1340
[4]   CONTRACTILE PROTEIN ISOFORMS IN MUSCLE DEVELOPMENT [J].
BANDMAN, E .
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1992, 154 (02) :273-283
[5]  
BATE M, 1991, DEVELOPMENT, V113, P79
[6]  
BATE M, 1990, DEVELOPMENT, V110, P791
[7]   Myogenesis:: A view from Drosophila [J].
Baylies, MK ;
Bate, M ;
Gomez, MR .
CELL, 1998, 93 (06) :921-927
[8]   ANALYSIS OF DROSOPHILA PARAMYOSIN - IDENTIFICATION OF A NOVEL ISOFORM WHICH IS RESTRICTED TO A SUBSET OF ADULT MUSCLES [J].
BECKER, KD ;
ODONNELL, PT ;
HEITZ, JM ;
VITO, M ;
BERNSTEIN, SI .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1992, 116 (03) :669-681
[9]   Differential muscle-type expression of the Drosophila troponin T gene -: A 3-base pair microexon is involved in visceral and hypodermic muscle specification [J].
Benoist, P ;
Mas, JA ;
Marco, R ;
Cervera, M .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 273 (13) :7538-7546
[10]  
BERNSTEIN SI, 1993, INT REV CYTOL, V143, P63