Redo aortic grafting after treatment of aortic graft infection

被引:10
作者
DiMuzio, PJ [1 ]
Reilly, LM [1 ]
Stoney, RJ [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,DIV VASC SURG,DEPT SURG,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0741-5214(96)70188-X
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This study was performed to determine the indications, operative strategy, and hemodynamic benefit of redo aortic grafting procedures after earlier excision of an infected aortic graft. Methods: Among 164 patients treated for aortic graft infection, 15 later underwent redo aortic grafting procedures an average of 18 months (range, 1 to 59 months) after removal of an infected aortic graft. Redo grafting procedures were performed for leg ischemia (n = 11) or infection (proven, n = 3; suspected, n = 1). The new aortic graft originated either from the distal thoracic aorta (n = 5) or from the juxtarenal aortic stump (n = 10). Follow-up averaged 56 months (range, 7 to 110 months). Results: All patients survived the redo grafting procedure. In the eleven patients who had ischemic symptoms, redo grafting procedures uniformly resulted in symptomatic improvement with an increase in ankle-brachial indexes (0.78 +/- 0.34 vs 0.50 +/- 0.29; p = 0.02). A graft limb occlusion developed in two of these patients (3 and 6 months), but no limbs were amputated. In the four patients who had proven or suspected extraanatomic bypass graft infection, there was one graft limb occlusion (29 months) and one amputation (17 months). Overall, recurrent graft infection occurred in three of 15 patients and may be more frequent in patients who have a proven extraanatomic bypass graft infection (2 of 3 vs 1 of 12; p = 0.08). Infection accounted for two of the three graft limb occlusions and two of the three late deaths. Recurrent infection was not associated with early (<1 year) regrafting procedures, and culture results did not correlate with the microbiologic features of the primary infection. Conclusions: Redo aortic grafting procedures can be performed safely and at relatively early intervals (6 to 12 months) after removal of the infected aortic graft. The procedure reliably relieves ischemic symptoms of the hemodynamically inadequate extraanatomic bypass graft. Reinfection remains a risk after redo aortic grafting procedures, particularly when heating established extraanatomic bypass graft infection.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 335
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
BOWES DE, 1990, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V31, P430
[2]   USE OF DESCENDING THORACIC AORTA FOR LOWER-LIMB REVASCULARIZATION [J].
BRANCHEREAU, A ;
MAGNAN, PE ;
MORACCHINI, P ;
ESPINOZA, H ;
MATHIEU, JP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1992, 6 (03) :255-262
[3]   DESCENDING THORACIC AORTOFEMORAL BYPASS FOR DISTAL AORTIC RECONSTRUCTION AFTER REMOVAL OF AN INFECTED DACRON PROSTHESIS [J].
BUXTON, B ;
SIMPSON, L ;
JOHNSON, N ;
MYERS, K .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1976, 2 (04) :133-&
[4]  
CASALI RE, 1980, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V115, P577
[5]  
Criado E, 1994, Ann Vasc Surg, V8, P38, DOI 10.1007/BF02133404
[6]  
De Laurentis DA, 1986, REOPERATIVE ARTERIAL, P195
[7]  
FANN JI, 1994, BASIC DATA UNDERLYIN, P378
[8]   THORACIC AORTA FEMORAL-ARTERY BYPASS - INDICATIONS, TECHNIQUE, AND LATE RESULTS [J].
FELDHAUS, RJ ;
STERPETTI, AV ;
SCHULTZ, RD ;
PEETZ, DJ .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1985, 40 (06) :588-592
[9]  
FRY WJ, 1967, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V94, P600
[10]  
FULENWIDER JT, 1983, SURGERY, V93, P20