Ten tips for reflexive bracketing

被引:111
作者
Ahern, KJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Churchlands, WA 6018, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1177/104973299129121947
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Despite the realization that total objectivity is neither achievable nor necessarily desirable in qualitative research, researchers often are required to put aside assumptions so that the true experiences of respondents are reflected in the analysis and reporting of research. In many qualitative publications and conference presentations, researchers report that they have attempted this process, but the means by which this attempt was made often are not explicated. lit this article, the author provides guidance to help qualitative researchers use reflexivity to identify areas of potential bias and to "bracket" them so their influence on the research process is minimal.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 411
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY
[2]  
Colaizzi P. F., 1978, PSYCHOL RES PHENOMEN, P48
[3]  
Crotty M, 1996, PHENOMENOLOGY NURSIN
[4]  
Davies J.L., 1991, Mental health and psychiatric nursing: A caring approach
[5]   Is there life after categories? Reflexivity in qualitative research [J].
Frank, G .
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 1997, 17 (02) :84-98
[6]   ISSUES CONCERNING THE FAMILIARITY OF RESEARCHERS WITH THE RESEARCH SETTING [J].
HANSON, EJ .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1994, 20 (05) :940-942
[7]  
Heidegger Martin., 1953, BEING IN TIME
[8]  
MYERHOFF B, 1992, REMEMBERED LIVES WOR, P305
[9]   Teacher-induced countertransference in clinical teaching [J].
Paterson, B ;
Groening, M .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1996, 23 (06) :1121-1126
[10]   NURSING RESEARCH CONVENTIONS - OBJECTIVITY OR OBFUSCATION [J].
PORTER, S .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1993, 18 (01) :137-143