Government grants, private R&D funding and innovation efficiency in transition economy

被引:112
作者
Hong, Jin [1 ]
Hong, Song [1 ]
Wang, Liangbing [1 ]
Xu, Yi [1 ]
Zhao, Dingtao [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
SFA; innovation efficiency; private R&D funding; high-tech industry; government grants; FIRM SIZE; DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDIES; TECHNOLOGY-PUSH; DEMAND-PULL; PERFORMANCE; CHINA; PRODUCTIVITY; JAPANESE; US; OWNERSHIP;
D O I
10.1080/09537325.2015.1060310
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
120117 [社会管理工程];
摘要
Although the development of the high-tech industry is part of the national agenda of many countries, particularly transition economies, few studies have analysed innovation efficiency in countries with environments unfavourable to high-tech industry development. This study explores the relationships of government grants, private R&D funding and innovation efficiencies of the high-tech industry in China. We use a stochastic frontier analysis model to study the roles of government and market mechanisms in high-tech industry innovation from 1995 to 2008. Findings show that government grants do not crowd out private funding, but stimulate private R&D expenditure. Private R&D funding has positively influenced innovation in the Chinese high-tech industry, and efficiency potentials are widely under-exploited. Additionally, government grants are observed to negatively impact innovation by large firms in the Chinese high-tech industry. Furthermore, we reveal that human capital can promote the innovation performance of high-tech firms, excepting those of medium scale. The findings provide insightful perspectives on China's high-tech industry.
引用
收藏
页码:1068 / 1096
页数:29
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]
Aigner D., 1977, J. Econometrics, V6, P21, DOI DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
[2]
The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms' innovation activities: The case of Eastern Germany [J].
Almus, M ;
Czarnitzki, D .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2003, 21 (02) :226-236
[3]
[Anonymous], 2003, STOCHASTIC FRONTIER
[4]
[Anonymous], THEORY EC DEV
[5]
[Anonymous], 1995, SELF OWNERSHIP FREED
[6]
[Anonymous], 2007, OECD REV INN POL CHI
[7]
[Anonymous], RES POLICY
[8]
Methods for using patents in cross-country comparisons [J].
Archambault, É .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2002, 54 (01) :15-30
[9]
Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys [J].
Archibugi, D ;
Pianta, M .
TECHNOVATION, 1996, 16 (09) :451-468
[10]
Archibugi D., 1992, SCI PUBL POLICY, V19, P357, DOI [DOI 10.1093/SPP/19.6.357, 10.1016/j.intacc.2008.06.004, DOI 10.1016/J.INTACC.2008.06.004, 10.1093/spp/19.6.357]