Testing for serial correlation, spatial autocorrelation and random effects using panel data

被引:217
作者
Baltagi, Badi H. [1 ]
Song, Seuck Heun
Jung, Byoung Cheol
Koh, Won
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Dept Econ, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[2] Syracuse Univ, Ctr Policy Res, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[3] Korea Univ, Dept Stat, Sungbuk Ku, Seoul 136701, South Korea
[4] Univ Seoul, Dept Stat, Dongdaemun Gu, Seoul 130743, South Korea
[5] KIDA, Ctr DM&S, Seoul 130650, South Korea
关键词
panel data; spatial error correlation; serial correlation; lagrange multiplier tests; likelihood ratio tests;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.09.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper considers a spatial panel data regression model with serial correlation on each spatial unit over time as well as spatial dependence between the spatial units at each point in time. In addition, the model allows for heterogeneity across the spatial units using random effects. The paper then derives several Lagrange multiplier tests for this panel data regression model including a joint test for serial correlation, spatial autocorrelation and random effects. These tests draw upon two strands of earlier work. The first is the LM tests for the spatial error correlation model discussed in Anselin and Bera [1998. Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In: Ullah, A., Giles, D.E.A. (Eds.), Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics. Marcel Dekker. New York] and in the panel data context by Baltagi et al. [2003. Testing panel data regression models with spatial error correlation. Journal of Econometrics 117, 123-150]. The second is the LM tests for the error component panel data model with serial correlation derived by Baltagi and Li [1995. Testing AR(1) against MA(1) disturbances in an error component model. Journal of Econometrics 68, 133-151]. Hence, the joint LM test derived in this paper encompasses those derived in both strands of earlier works. In fact, in the context of our general model, the earlier LM tests become marginal LM tests that ignore either serial correlation over time or spatial error correlation. The paper then derives conditional LM and LR tests that do not ignore these correlations and contrast them with their marginal LM and LR counterparts. The small sample performance of these tests is investigated using Monte Carlo experiments. As expected, ignoring any correlation when it is significant can lead to misleading inference. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 51
页数:47
相关论文
共 26 条