Naive probability: A mental model theory of extensional reasoning

被引:195
作者
Johnson-Laird, PN [1 ]
Legrenzi, P
Girotto, V
Legrenzi, MS
Caverni, JP
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Psychol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Univ Milan, Ist Psicol, Fac Lettere & Filosofia, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Aix Marseille 1, Ctr Rech Psychol Cognit, CREPCO, Aix En Provence, France
[4] Univ Padua, Dipartimento Psicol Gen, Padua, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.62
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article outlines a theory of naive probability. According to the theory, individuals who are unfamiliar with the probability calculus can infer the probabilities of events in an extensional way: They construct mental models of what is true in the various possibilities. Each model represents an equiprobable alternative unless individuals have beliefs to the contrary, in which case some models will have higher probabilities than others. The probability of an event depends on the proportion of models in which it occurs. The theory predicts several phenomena of reasoning about absolute probabilities, including typical biases. It correctly predicts certain cognitive illusions in inferences about relative probabilities. It accommodates reasoning based on numerical premises, and it explains how naive reasoners can infer posterior probabilities without relying on Bayes's theorem. Finally, it dispels some common misconceptions of probabilistic reasoning.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 88
页数:27
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Thinking: An invitation to cognitive science
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1966, NEW HORIZONS PSYCHOL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, MENTAL MODELS REPRES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1982, VISION COMPUTATIONAL
[5]   SOME TEASERS CONCERNING CONDITIONAL PROBABILITIES [J].
BARHILLEL, M ;
FALK, R .
COGNITION, 1982, 11 (02) :109-122
[6]   A model theory of modal reasoning [J].
Bell, VA ;
Johnson-Laird, PN .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 1998, 22 (01) :25-51
[7]   A THEORY OF IF - A LEXICAL ENTRY, REASONING PROGRAM, AND PRAGMATIC PRINCIPLES [J].
BRAINE, MDS ;
OBRIEN, DP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1991, 98 (02) :182-203
[8]   SOME EMPIRICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR A THEORY OF NATURAL PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC [J].
BRAINE, MDS ;
REISER, BJ ;
RUMAIN, B .
PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MOTIVATION-ADVANCES IN RESEARCH AND THEORY, 1984, 18 :313-371
[9]   INTERPRETATION BY PHYSICIANS OF CLINICAL LABORATORY RESULTS [J].
CASSCELLS, W ;
SCHOENBERGER, A ;
GRABOYS, TB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1978, 299 (18) :999-1001
[10]  
COLLINS A, 1989, COGNITIVE SCI, V13, P1, DOI 10.1207/s15516709cog1301_1