Ensiling agricultural residues for bioethanol production

被引:74
作者
Chen, Ye
Sharma-Shivappa, Ratna R.
Chen, Chengci
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Montana State Univ, Cent Agr Res Ctr, Moccasin, MT 59462 USA
关键词
carbohydrate; ensiling; enzyme; feedstocks; fermentation; hydrolysis; lignin; pretreatment;
D O I
10.1007/s12010-007-0030-7
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 [生物化学与分子生物学]; 081704 [应用化学];
摘要
The potential of using ensiling, with and without supplemental enzymes, as a cost-effective pretreatment for bioethanol production from agricultural residues was investigated. Ensiling did not significantly affect the lignin content of barley straw, cotton stalk, and triticale hay ensiled without enzyme, but slightly increased the lignin content in triticale straw, wheat straw, and triticale hay ensiled with enzyme. The holocellulose ( cellulose plus hemicellulose) losses in the feedstocks, as a result of ensiling, ranged from 1.31 to 9.93%. The percent holocellulose loss in hays during ensiling was lower than in straws and stalks. Ensiling of barley, triticale, wheat straws, and cotton stalk significantly increased the conversion of holocellulose to sugars during subsequent hydrolysis with two enzyme combinations. Enzymatic hydrolysis of ensiled and untreated feedstocks by Celluclast 1.5 L-Novozyme 188 enzyme combination resulted in equal or higher saccharification than with Spezyme (R) CP-xylanase combination. Enzyme loadings of 40 and 60 FPU/g reducing sugars gave similar sugar yields. The percent saccharification with Celluclast 1.5 L-Novozyme 188 at 40 FPU/g reducing sugars was 17.1 to 43.6%, 22.4 to 46.9%, and 23.2 to 32.2% for untreated feedstocks, feedstocks ensiled with, and without enzymes, respectively. Fermentation of the hydrolysates from ensiled feedstocks resulted in ethanol yields ranging from 0.21 to 0.28 g/g reducing sugars.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 92
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]
MOLECULAR-BEAM MASS-SPECTROMETRIC ANALYSIS OF LIGNOCELLULOSIC MATERIALS .1. HERBACEOUS BIOMASS [J].
AGBLEVOR, FA ;
EVANS, RJ ;
JOHNSON, KD .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS, 1994, 30 (02) :125-144
[2]
Composition and ethanol production potential of cotton gin residues [J].
Agblevor, FA ;
Batz, S ;
Trumbo, J .
APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2003, 105 (1-3) :219-230
[3]
ANDERSON JW, 1991, MOL ACTIVITIES PLANT, P275
[4]
Effect of types of non-fiber carbohydrate on in vitro forage fiber digestion of low-quality grass hay [J].
Arroquy, JI ;
Cochran, RC ;
Nagaraja, TG ;
Titgemeyer, EC ;
Johnson, DE .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 120 (1-2) :93-106
[5]
*ASAE, 2001, ASAE S269 4 DEC01 AS
[6]
BUOYANT DENSITIES AND DRY-MATTER CONTENTS OF MICROORGANISMS - CONVERSION OF A MEASURED BIOVOLUME INTO BIOMASS [J].
BAKKEN, LR ;
OLSEN, RA .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1983, 45 (04) :1188-1195
[7]
THE BIOLOGICAL DEGRADATION OF CELLULOSE [J].
BEGUIN, P ;
AUBERT, JP .
FEMS MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 1994, 13 (01) :25-58
[8]
Ethanol production from AFEX-treated forages and agricultural residues [J].
Belkacemi, K ;
Turcotte, G ;
de Halleux, D ;
Savoie, P .
APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1998, 70-2 (1) :441-462
[9]
Bjerre AB, 1996, BIOTECHNOL BIOENG, V49, P568, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19960305)49:5<568::AID-BIT10>3.3.CO
[10]
2-4