Salt-dependent DNA superhelix diameter studied by small angle neutron scattering measurements and Monte Carlo simulations

被引:56
作者
Hammermann, M
Brun, N
Klenin, KV
May, R
Tóth, K
Langowski, J
机构
[1] German Canc Res Ctr, Biophys Macromol Div, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] ILL Grenoble, F-38042 Grenoble 9, France
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77746-X
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Using small angle neutron scattering we have measured the static form factor of two different superhelical DNAs, p1868 (1868 bp) and pUC18 (2686 bp), in dilute aqueous solution at salt concentrations between 0 and 1.5 M Na+ in 10 mM Tris at 0% and 100% D2O. For both DNA molecules, the theoretical static form factor was also calculated from an ensemble of Monte Carlo configurations generated by a previously described model. Simulated and measured form factors of both DNAs showed the same behavior between 10 and 100 mM salt concentration: An undulation in the scattering curve at a momentum transfer q = 0.5 nm(-1) present at lower concentration disappears above 100 mM. The position of the undulation corresponds to a distance of similar to 10-20 nm. This indicated a change in the DNA superhelix diameter, as the undulation is not present in the scattering curve of the relaxed DNA. From the measured scattering curves of superhelical DNA we estimated the superhelix diameter as a function of Na+ concentration by a quantitative comparison with the scattering curve of relaxed DNA. The ratio of the scattering curves of superhelical and relaxed DNA is very similar to the form factor of a pair of point scatterers. We concluded that the distance of this pair corresponds to the interstrand separation in the superhelix. The computed superhelix diameter of 16.0 +/- 0.9 nm at 10 mM decreased to 9.0 +/- 0.7 nm at 100 mM salt concentration. Measured and simulated scattering curves agreed almost quantitatively, therefore we also calculated the superhelix diameter from the simulated conformations. It decreased from 18.0 +/- 1.5 nm at 10 mM to 9.4 +/- 1.5 nm at 100 mM salt concentration. This value did not significantly change to lower values at higher Na+ concentration, in agreement with results obtained by electron microscopy, scanning force microscopy imaging in aqueous solution, and recent MC simulations, but in contrast to the observation of a lateral collapse of the DNA superhelix as indicated by cryo-electron microscopy studies.
引用
收藏
页码:3057 / 3063
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   DIRECT VISUALIZATION OF SUPERCOILED DNA-MOLECULES IN SOLUTION [J].
ADRIAN, M ;
TENHEGGELERBORDIER, B ;
WAHLI, W ;
STASIAK, AZ ;
STASIAK, A ;
DUBOCHET, J .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1990, 9 (13) :4551-4554
[2]  
Bates A. D., 1993, DNA topology
[3]   THE TWIST, WRITHE AND OVERALL SHAPE OF SUPERCOILED DNA CHANGE DURING COUNTERION-INDUCED TRANSITION FROM A LOOSELY TO A TIGHTLY INTERWOUND SUPERHELIX - POSSIBLE IMPLICATIONS FOR DNA-STRUCTURE IN-VIVO [J].
BEDNAR, J ;
FURRER, P ;
STASIAK, A ;
DUBOCHET, J ;
EGELMAN, EH ;
BATES, AD .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1994, 235 (03) :825-847
[4]   STRUCTURE OF PLECTONEMICALLY SUPERCOILED DNA [J].
BOLES, TC ;
WHITE, JH ;
COZZARELLI, NR .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1990, 213 (04) :931-951
[5]   ENVIRONMENTAL-INFLUENCES ON DNA SUPERHELICITY - THE EFFECT OF IONIC-STRENGTH ON SUPERHELIX CONFORMATION IN SOLUTION [J].
BRADY, GW ;
SATKOWSKI, M ;
FOOS, D ;
BENHAM, CJ .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1987, 195 (01) :185-191
[6]  
Debye P, 1915, ANN PHYS-BERLIN, V46, P809
[7]   Effects of Na+ and Mg2+ on the structures of supercoiled DNAs: Comparison of simulations with experiments [J].
Gebe, JA ;
Delrow, JJ ;
Heath, PJ ;
Fujimoto, BS ;
Stewart, DW ;
Schurr, JM .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1996, 262 (02) :105-128
[8]   MONTE-CARLO SIMULATIONS OF SUPERCOILING FREE-ENERGIES FOR UNKNOTTED AND TREFOIL KNOTTED DNAS [J].
GEBE, JA ;
ALLISON, SA ;
CLENDENNING, JB ;
SCHURR, JM .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 68 (02) :619-633
[9]   X-RAY CONFORMATIONAL STUDY OF THE DNA DUPLEX IN SOLUTION [J].
GRASSIAN, V ;
BRADY, GW ;
BENHAM, CJ .
BIOPOLYMERS, 1983, 22 (06) :1523-1543
[10]  
HAGERMAN PJ, 1988, ANNU REV BIOPHYS BIO, V17, P265