Effect of raloxifene on mammographic density and breast magnetic resonance imaging in premenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer

被引:51
作者
Eng-Wong, Jennifer [1 ]
Orzano-Birgani, Jennifer [1 ]
Chow, Catherine K. [3 ]
Venzon, David [2 ]
Yao, Jianhua [3 ]
Galbo, Claudia E. [4 ]
Zujewski, Jo Anne [1 ]
Prindiville, Sheila [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Ctr Canc Res, Med Oncol Branch, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NCI, Ctr Canc Res, Biostat & Data Management Sect, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NIH, Warren Grant Magnuson Clin Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol Sci, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2752
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Mammographic density is a risk factor for breast cancer. Mammographic density and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volume (MRIV) assess the amount of fibroglandular tissue in the breast. Mammographic density and MRIV can be modulated with hormonal interventions, suggesting that these imaging modalities may be useful as surrogate end-point biomarkers for breast cancer chemoprevention trials. We evaluated the effect of raloxifene on mammographic density and MRIV in premenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer. Methods: Mammograms and MRI were obtained at baseline and after 1 and 2 years of 60 mg raloxifene by mouth daily for 27 premenopausal women. Mammographic percent dense area was calculated using a semiquantitative thresholding technique. T-1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo MRI with fat suppression was used to determine breast MRIV using a semiautomatic method. Mean change in mammographic density and median change in MRIV were assessed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: No significant change in mammographic density was seen after treatment with raloxifene. Mean change after 1 year was 1% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), -3 to +5] and after 2 years was 1% (95% CI, -2 to +5). MRIV decreased on raloxifene. Median relative change in MRIV after 1 year was -17% (95% Cl, -28 to -9; P 0.0017) and after 2 years was -16% (95% CI, -31 to -4; P 0.0004). Conclusions: In high-risk premenopausal women, mammographic density did not change on raloxifene, whereas MRIV significantly declined. Our findings suggest that MRIV is a promising surrogate biomarker in premenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer and should be investigated further in breast cancer prevention trials.
引用
收藏
页码:1696 / 1701
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Boyd N, 2002, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V11, P1048
[2]  
Boyd NF, 1998, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V7, P1133
[3]   Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer [J].
Boyd, NF ;
Rommens, JM ;
Vogt, K ;
Lee, V ;
Hopper, JL ;
Yaffe, MJ ;
Paterson, AD .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (10) :798-808
[4]   Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer [J].
Boyd, NF ;
Dite, GS ;
Stone, J ;
Gunasekara, A ;
English, DR ;
McCredie, MRE ;
Giles, GG ;
Tritchler, D ;
Chiarelli, A ;
Yaffe, MJ ;
Hopper, JL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (12) :886-894
[5]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MAMMOGRAPHIC AND HISTOLOGICAL RISK-FACTORS FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
BOYD, NF ;
JENSEN, HM ;
COOKE, G ;
HAN, HL .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1992, 84 (15) :1170-1179
[6]   The relationship of anthropometric measures to radiological features of the breast in premenopausal women [J].
Boyd, NF ;
Lockwood, GA ;
Byng, JW ;
Little, LE ;
Yaffe, MJ ;
Tritchler, DL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 78 (09) :1233-1238
[7]  
Brisson J, 2000, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V9, P911
[8]   Mammographic breast density, dense area, and breast area differences by phase in the menstrual cycle [J].
Buist, Diana S. M. ;
Aiello, Erin J. ;
Miglioretti, Diana L. ;
White, Emily .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (11) :2303-2306
[9]   Defining the role of aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant endocrine treatment of early breast cancer [J].
Buzdar, Aman ;
Chlebowski, Rowan ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Duffy, Sean ;
Forbes, John ;
Jonat, Walter ;
Ravdin, Peter .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2006, 22 (08) :1575-1585
[10]  
Byrne C, 2000, CANCER RES, V60, P3744