Methods for estimating adsorbed uranium(VI) and distribution coefficients of contaminated sediments

被引:108
作者
Kohler, M [1 ]
Curtis, GP
Meece, DE
Davis, JA
机构
[1] Solar Energy Res Inst, Environm Sci & Engn Div, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es0341236
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Assessing the quantity of U(VI) that participates in sorption/desorption processes in a contaminated aquifer is an important task when investigating U migration behavior. U-contaminated aquifer sediments were obtained from 16 different locations at a former U mill tailings site at Naturita, CO (U.S.A.) and were extracted with an artificial groundwater, a high pH sodium bicarbonate solution, hydroxylamine hydrochloride solution, and concentrated nitric acid. With an isotopic exchange method, both a K-D value for the specific experimental conditions as well as the total exchangeable mass of U(VI) was determined. Except for one sample, KD values determined by isotopic exchange with U-contaminated sediments that were in equilibrium with atmospheric CO2 agreed within a factor of 2 with KD values predicted from a nonelectrostatic surface complexation model (NEM) developed from U(VI) adsorption experiments with uncontaminated sediments. The labile fraction of U(VI) and U extracted by the bicarbonate solution were highly correlated (r(2) = 0.997), with a slope of 0.96 +/- 0.01. The proximity of the slope to one suggests that both methods likely access the same reservoir of U(VI) associated with the sediments. The results indicate that the bicarbonate extraction method is useful for estimating the mass of labile U(VI) in sediments that do not contain U(IV). In-situ K-D values calculated from the measured labile U(VI) and the dissolved U(VI) in the Naturita alluvial aquifer agreed within a factor of 3 with in-situ KD values predicted with the NEM and groundwater chemistry at each well.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 247
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
ALTMANN S, 2001, RADIOACTIVE WASTE MA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, 306 HYDRAQL
[3]   Sorption behavior of U(VI) on phyllite:: experiments and modeling [J].
Arnold, T ;
Zorn, T ;
Zänker, H ;
Bernhard, G ;
Nitsche, H .
JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 2001, 47 (2-4) :219-231
[4]   Modelling the closure-related geochemical evolution of groundwater at a former uranium mine [J].
Bain, JG ;
Mayer, KU ;
Blowes, DW ;
Frind, EO ;
Molson, JWH ;
Kahnt, R ;
Jenk, U .
JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 2001, 52 (1-4) :109-135
[5]   U(VI) adsorption to heterogeneous subsurface media: Application of a surface complexation model [J].
Barnett, MO ;
Jardine, PM ;
Brooks, SC .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 36 (05) :937-942
[6]   How the Kd approach undermines ground water cleanup [J].
Bethke, CM ;
Brady, PV .
GROUND WATER, 2000, 38 (03) :435-443
[7]   Simulation of the effects of geochemical reactions on groundwater quality during planned flooding of the Konigstein uranium mine, Saxony, Germany [J].
Biehler, D ;
Falck, WE .
HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 1999, 7 (03) :284-293
[8]  
Davis J. A., 2002, Geochemistry of soil radionuclides, P61
[9]  
DAVIS JA, 1990, REV MINERAL, V23, P177
[10]  
Davis JA, 2001, NUREGCR6708