Is magnetic resonance imaging safe in cardiac pacemaker recipients?

被引:46
作者
Del Ojo, JL
Moya, F
Villalba, J
Sanz, O
Pavón, R
Garcia, D
Pastor, L
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Valme, Serv Cardiol, Seville 41014, Spain
[2] PET Cartuja, Seville, Spain
[3] CERCO, Seville, Spain
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2005年 / 28卷 / 04期
关键词
pacemaker; magnetic resonance imaging; pacemaker complications; pacemaker reprogramming;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.50033.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently contraindicated in cardiac pacemaker (PM) recipients. The objectives of this prospective study were to (1) reassess the risks of performing an MRI scan in patients with PM, (2) compared the pacing functions before and after the exposure to MRI, and (3) monitor the development of possible adverse effects. Thirteen patients implanted with an Affinity (TM) DR model 5330 PMs (St. Jude Medical) connected to a Tendril (TM) model 1388 leads (St. Jude Medical) underwent 2.0 T-MRI for a variety of indications. All patients displayed a stable spontaneous rhythm at the time of the MRI scan and were not considered to be PM-dependent. The sensing and pacing functions were analyzed and the impedance of both leads was measured before and after the scan. The MRI scan was performed with all PM programmed in DDD mode. The sensing configuration was bipolar. All patients were monitored utilizing a standard electrocardiographic monitor and direct verbal communication. PM Inhibition, asynchronous pacing, or inappropriately rapid pacing was not observed. No patient reported discomfort, heat, or motion sensation at the PM implant site. There were no significant differences in the sensing, stimulation, AutoCapture((R)) threshold, and lead impedance measurements before and after MRI. The results of this study suggest that performing 2.0 T-MRI scans in patients with Affinity (TM) DR model 5330 PM connected to a Tendril (TM) model 1388 lead is safe.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 278
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Effects of magnetic resonance Imaging on cardiac pacemakers and electrodes [J].
Achenbach, S ;
Moshage, W ;
Diem, B ;
Bieberle, T ;
Schibgilla, V ;
Bachmann, K .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1997, 134 (03) :467-473
[2]   EFFECT OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING ON DDD PACEMAKERS [J].
ERLEBACHER, JA ;
CAHILL, PT ;
PANNIZZO, F ;
KNOWLES, RJR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1986, 57 (06) :437-440
[3]   THE EFFECTS OF NUCLEAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGERS ON EXTERNAL AND IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATORS [J].
FETTER, J ;
ARAM, G ;
HOLMES, DR ;
GRAY, JE ;
HAYES, DL .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 7 (04) :720-727
[4]  
FONTAINE JM, 1998, PACING CLIN ELECTROP, V21, P1136
[5]  
Garcia-Bolao I, 1998, ACTA CARDIOL, V53, P33
[6]   Can patients with implantable pacemakers safely undergo magnetic resonance imaging? [J].
Gimbel, JR ;
Kanal, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (07) :1325-1327
[7]   Safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging on five patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers [J].
Gimbel, JR ;
Johnson, D ;
Levine, PA ;
Wilkoff, BL .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 19 (06) :913-919
[8]   PACEMAKER MALFUNCTION [J].
HAYES, DL ;
VLIETSTRA, RE .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 119 (08) :828-835
[9]   American college of radiology white paper on MR safety: 2004 update and revisions [J].
Kanal, E ;
Borgstede, JP ;
Barkovich, AJ ;
Bell, C ;
Bradley, WG ;
Etheridge, S ;
Felmlee, JP ;
Froelich, JW ;
Hayden, J ;
Kaminski, EM ;
Lester, JW ;
Scoumis, EA ;
Zaremba, LA ;
Zinninger, MD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (05) :1111-1114
[10]   MEDICAL IMAGING BY NMR [J].
MANSFIELD, P ;
MAUDSLEY, AA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1977, 50 (591) :188-194