Smoking topography, brand switching, and nicotine delivery:: Results from an in vivo study

被引:139
作者
Hammond, D
Fong, GT
Cummings, KM
Hyland, A
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Psychol, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Hlth Behav, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0498
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Exposure to toxins in tobacco smoke is influenced by how a cigarette is smoked. Cigarettes have been designed to allow for a range of puffing behavior and to provide different, nonlinear tar and nicotine yields in response to different puffing profiles. However, puffing behavior and its influence upon risk-exposure has yet to be assessed outside the laboratory, in smokers' natural environment. Method: Fifty-nine adult smokers used a portable device to measure smoking topography over the course of three 1-week trials. Participants were asked to smoke their usual "regular yield" brand through the device for trial 1 and again, 6 weeks later, at trial 2. Half the subjects were then randomly assigned to switch to a "low-yield" brand for trial 3. Results: The findings show a high degree of stability in puffing behavior within the same subject over time but considerable variability between smokers. Smokers who were switched to a "low-yield" cigarette increased their total smoke intake per cigarette by 40% (P = 0.007), with no significant change in their salivary cotinine levels. Cigarettes smoked per day and nicotine yield were only weakly associated with salivary cotinine levels; however, salivary cotinine was strongly associated with a composite measure that included cigarettes per day, brand elasticity, and puffing behavior (sr = 0.61, P < 0.001). Conclusions: These findings provide strong evidence of behavioral compensation to low-yield cigarettes from in vivo measures of smoking behavior. The findings also show the importance of brand elasticity and smoking topography in predicting nicotine uptake and smoke exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:1370 / 1375
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Ahijevych K, 1997, RES NURS HEALTH, V20, P505, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199712)20:6<505::AID-NUR5>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-Q
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, DET TAR NIC CARB MON
[4]   Tobacco-specific nitrosamines in tobacco from US brand and non-US brand cigarettes [J].
Ashley, DL ;
Beeson, MD ;
Johnson, DR ;
McCraw, JM ;
Richter, P ;
Pirkle, JL ;
Pechacek, TF ;
Song, SQ ;
Watson, CH .
NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2003, 5 (03) :323-331
[5]  
AYRES CI, 1984, BAT STANCE COMPENSAT
[6]   SMOKE YIELD OF CIGARETTES AND PUFFING BEHAVIOR IN MEN AND WOMEN [J].
BATTIG, K ;
BUZZI, R ;
NIL, R .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1982, 76 (02) :139-148
[7]   SMOKERS OF LOW-YIELD CIGARETTES DO NOT CONSUME LESS NICOTINE [J].
BENOWITZ, NL ;
HALL, SM ;
HERNING, RI ;
JACOB, P ;
JONES, RT ;
OSMAN, AL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 309 (03) :139-142
[8]   INFLUENCE OF SMOKING FEWER CIGARETTES ON EXPOSURE TO TAR, NICOTINE, AND CARBON-MONOXIDE [J].
BENOWITZ, NL ;
JACOB, P ;
KOZLOWSKI, LT ;
YU, L .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 315 (21) :1310-1313
[9]  
Benowitz NL., 2001, Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph, V13, P39
[10]  
BENOWITZ NL, 1996, NIH PUBLICATION, P93