Analysis and optimization of structure-based virtual screening protocols 2. Examination of docked ligand orientation sampling methodology: mapping a pharmacophore for success

被引:32
作者
Good, AC
Cheney, DL
Sitkoff, DF
Tokarski, JS
Stouch, TR
Bassolino, DA
Krystek, SR
Li, Y
Mason, JS
Perkins, TDJ
机构
[1] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Wallingford, CT 06492 USA
[2] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
[3] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
[4] Prother PLC, Runcorn W47 4QF, Cheshire, England
关键词
ligand sampling; structure-based virtual screening; chemotype enrichment tests; pharmacophore constraints;
D O I
10.1016/S1093-3263(03)00124-4
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
An important element of any structure-based virtual screening (SVS) technique is the method used to orient the ligands in the target active site. This has been a somewhat overlooked issue in recent SVS validation studies, with the assumption being made that the performance of an algorithm for a given set of orientation sampling settings will be representative for the general behavior of said technique. Here, we analyze five different SVS targets using a variety of sampling paradigms within the DOCK, GOLD and PROMETHEUS programs over a data set of similar to10,000 noise compounds, combined with data sets containing multiple active compounds. These sets have been broken down by chemotype, with chemotype hit rate used to provide a measure of enrichment with a potentially improved relevance to real world SVS experiments. The variability in enrichment results produced by different sampling paradigms is illustrated, as is the utility of using pharmacophores to constrain sampling to regions that reflect known structural biology. The difference in results when comparing chemotype with compound hit rates is also highlighted. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 40
页数:10
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
*ACC, LUDI CATALYST
[2]   New approach to molecular docking and its application to virtual screening of chemical databases [J].
Baxter, CA ;
Murray, CW ;
Waszkowycz, B ;
Li, J ;
Sykes, RA ;
Bone, RGA ;
Perkins, TDJ ;
Wylie, W .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2000, 40 (02) :254-262
[3]   Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations [J].
Bissantz, C ;
Folkers, G ;
Rognan, D .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 43 (25) :4759-4767
[4]   Novel inhibitors of DNA gyrase: 3D structure based biased needle screening, hit validation by biophysical methods, and 3D guided optimization. A promising alternative to random screening [J].
Boehm, HJ ;
Boehringer, M ;
Bur, D ;
Gmuender, H ;
Huber, W ;
Klaus, W ;
Kostrewa, D ;
Kuehne, H ;
Luebbers, T ;
Meunier-Keller, N .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 43 (14) :2664-2674
[5]  
*CDCC, GOLD VERS 1 2
[6]   Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins [J].
Charifson, PS ;
Corkery, JJ ;
Murcko, MA ;
Walters, WP .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 42 (25) :5100-5109
[7]   SOLVENT-ACCESSIBLE SURFACES OF PROTEINS AND NUCLEIC-ACIDS [J].
CONNOLLY, ML .
SCIENCE, 1983, 221 (4612) :709-713
[8]  
GOOD AC, 2000, VIRTUAL SCREEN ING B, V10, P131
[9]   Evaluation of docking/scoring approaches: A comparative study based on MMP3 inhibitors [J].
Ha, S ;
Andreani, R ;
Robbins, A ;
Muegge, I .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2000, 14 (05) :435-448
[10]  
*KUNT GROUP, DOCK