Cycling of conventional power plants: Technical limits and actual costs

被引:124
作者
Van den Bergh, Kenneth [1 ]
Delarue, Erik [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leuven KU Leuven, Energy Inst, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Power plant cycling; Cycling costs; Power plant scheduling; WIND POWER; UNIT COMMITMENT; GENERATION; OPERATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2015.03.026
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Cycling of conventional generation units is an important source of operational flexibility in the electricity generation system. Cycling is changing the power output of conventional units by means of ramping and switching (starting up and shutting down). In the literature, a wide range of technical and cost-related cycling parameters can be found. Different studies allocate different cycling parameters to similar generation units. This paper assesses the impact of different cycling parameters allocated to a conventional generation portfolio. Both the technical limitations of power plants and all costs related to cycling are considered. The results presented in this paper follow from a unit commitment model, used for a case study based on the German 2013 system, The conventional generation portfolio has to deliver different residual load time series, corresponding to different levels of renewables penetration. The study shows, under the assumptions made, that although the dynamic limits of some units are reached, the limits of the conventional generation portfolio as a whole are not reached, even if stringent dynamic parameters are assigned to the generation portfolio and a highly variable residual load is imposed to the system. The study shows also the importance of including full cycling costs in the unit commitment scheduling. The cycling cost can be reduced by up to 40% when fully taken into account. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 77
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
50Hertz Transmission, 2013, GERM TRANSM SYST OP
[2]   Overview of wind power intermittency impacts on power systems [J].
Albadi, M. H. ;
El-Saadany, E. F. .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2010, 80 (06) :627-632
[3]  
Amprion, 2013, GERM TRANSM SYST OP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 12 INS GERM EN
[5]   Optimal response of a thermal unit to an electricity spot market [J].
Arroyo, JM ;
Conejo, AJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2000, 15 (03) :1098-1104
[6]   Combined cycle power plants: A comparison between two different dynamic models to evaluate transient behaviour and residual life [J].
Benato, Alberto ;
Stoppato, Anna ;
Bracco, Stefano .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 87 :1269-1280
[7]  
Cochran Jaquelin., 2013, Flexible Coal - Evolution from Baseload to Peaking Plant
[8]   Power systems balancing with high penetration renewables: The potential of demand response in Hawaii [J].
Critz, D. Karl ;
Busche, Sarah ;
Connors, Stephen .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 76 :609-619
[9]   The actual effect of wind power on overall electricity generation costs and CO2 emissions [J].
Delarue, Erik D. ;
Luickx, Patrick J. ;
D'haeseleer, William D. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 50 (06) :1450-1456
[10]   The impact of carbon prices on generation-cycling costs [J].
Denny, Eleanor ;
O'Malley, Mark .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (04) :1204-1212