Clinical accuracy of RIFLE and Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria for acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

被引:231
作者
Englberger, Lars [1 ]
Suri, Rakesh M. [1 ]
Li, Zhuo [2 ]
Casey, Edward T. [3 ]
Daly, Richard C. [1 ]
Dearani, Joseph A. [1 ]
Schaff, Hartzell V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Cardiovasc Surg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Biostat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Nephrol & Hypertens, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
来源
CRITICAL CARE | 2011年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
ACUTE-RENAL-FAILURE; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; CLASSIFICATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; DEFINITION; CREATININE; OUTCOMES; RISK; GFR;
D O I
10.1186/cc9960
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: The RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss of kidney function, and end-stage renal failure) classification for acute kidney injury (AKI) was recently modified by the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN). The two definition systems differ in several aspects, and it is not clearly determined which has the better clinical accuracy. Methods: In a retrospective observational study we investigated 4,836 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass from 2005 to 2007 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. AKI was defined by RIFLE and AKIN criteria. Results: Significantly more patients were diagnosed as AKI by AKIN (26.3%) than by RIFLE (18.9%) criteria (P < 0.0001). Both definitions showed excellent association to outcome variables with worse outcome by increased severity of AKI (P < 0.001, all variables). Mortality was increased with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.5 (95% CI 3.6 to 5.6) for one class increase by RIFLE and an OR of 5.3 (95% CI 4.3 to 6.6) for one stage increase by AKIN. The multivariate model showed lower predictive ability of RIFLE for mortality. Patients classified as AKI in one but not in the other definition set were predominantly staged in the lowest AKI severity class (9.6% of patients in AKIN stage 1, 2.3% of patients in RIFLE class R). Potential misclassification of AKI is higher in AKIN, which is related to moving the 48-hour diagnostic window applied in AKIN criteria only. The greatest disagreement between both definition sets could be detected in patients with initial postoperative decrease of serum creatinine. Conclusions: Modification of RIFLE by staging of all patients with acute renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the failure class F may improve predictive value. AKIN applied in patients undergoing cardiac surgery without correction of serum creatinine for fluid balance may lead to over-diagnosis of AKI (poor positive predictive value). Balancing limitations of both definition sets of AKI, we suggest application of the RIFLE criteria in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] A comparison of the RIFLE and AKIN criteria for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients
    Bagshaw, Sean M.
    George, Carol
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 23 (05) : 1569 - 1574
  • [2] A comparison of observed versus estimated baseline creatinine for determination of RIFLE class in patients with acute kidney injury
    Bagshaw, Sean M.
    Uchino, Shigehiko
    Cruz, Dinna
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    Morimatsu, Hiroshi
    Morgera, Stanislao
    Schetz, Miet
    Tan, Ian
    Bouman, Catherine
    Macedo, Etienne
    Gibney, Noel
    Tolwani, Ashita
    Oudemans-van Straaten, Heleen M.
    Ronco, Claudio
    Kellum, John A.
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 24 (09) : 2739 - 2744
  • [3] Acute kidney injury criteria predict outcomes of critically ill patients
    Barrantes, Fidel
    Tian, Jianmin
    Vazquez, Rodrigo
    Amoateng-Adjepong, Yaw
    Manthous, Constantine A.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (05) : 1397 - 1403
  • [4] Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group
    Bellomo, R
    Ronco, C
    Kellum, JA
    Mehta, RL
    Palevsky, P
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2004, 8 (04): : R204 - R212
  • [5] Long-Term Risk of Mortality and Acute Kidney Injury During Hospitalization After Major Surgery
    Bihorac, Azra
    Yavas, Sinan
    Subbiah, Sophie
    Hobson, Charles E.
    Schold, Jesse D.
    Gabrielli, Andrea
    Layon, A. Joseph
    Segal, Mark S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 249 (05) : 851 - 858
  • [6] ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY CLASSIFICATION: COMPARISON OF AKIN AND RIFLE CRITERIA
    Chang, Chih-Hsiang
    Lin, Chan-Yu
    Tian, Ya-Chung
    Jenq, Chang-Chyi
    Chang, Ming-Yang
    Chen, Yung-Chang
    Fang, Ji-Tseng
    Yang, Chih-Wei
    [J]. SHOCK, 2010, 33 (03): : 247 - 252
  • [7] Clinical review: RIFLE and AKIN - time for reappraisal
    Cruz, Dinna N.
    Ricci, Zaccaria
    Ronco, Claudio
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 13 (03) : 211
  • [8] Formula-based estimates of the GFR: Equations variable and uncertain
    Delanaye, Pierre
    Cohen, Eric P.
    [J]. NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2008, 110 (01): : C48 - C53
  • [9] RIFLE is not RIFLE: on the comparability of results
    Englberger, Lars
    Suri, Rakesh M.
    Schaff, Hartzell V.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 13 (06):
  • [10] A comparison of the RIFLE and Acute Kidney Injury Network classifications for cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: A prospective cohort study
    Haase, Michael
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    Matalanis, George
    Calzavacca, Paolo
    Dragun, Duska
    Haase-Fielitz, Anja
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 138 (06) : 1370 - 1376