Delayed therapy with curative intent in a contemporary prostate cancer watchful-waiting cohort

被引:21
作者
El-Geneidy, M
Garzotto, M
Panagiotou, I
Hsieh, YC
Mori, M
Peters, L
Klein, T
Beer, TM
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Med Oncol, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] OHSU & Portland VA Med Ctr, Div Urol, Portland, OR USA
[3] OHSU Canc Inst, Portland, OR USA
关键词
prostate cancer; watchful waiting; radiation treatment; prostatectomy;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04669.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To identify predictors of delayed therapy with curative intent, an increasingly common option in contemporary patients with prostate cancer who initially choose watchful waiting. The characteristics of all patients at one institution and diagnosed with T1-4NXM0 prostate cancer between 1993 and 2000 were prospectively recorded. Factors recorded included: age, tumour stage, histological type, Gleason score, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, prostate volume, PSA density (PSAD), percentage of positive biopsy cores, and the initial treatment selection. Outcomes, including all cancer-directed interventions, all serum PSA values, and initial outcomes of all interventions with curative intent, were determined by review of all medical records and cancer registry data. Of 187 patients on watchful waiting, 175 had stage T1 or T2 cancer and were analysed primarily. Thirty-eight (22%) of these patients received delayed intervention with curative intent (15 radical prostatectomy, 17 external beam radiotherapy, six brachytherapy). Age (P < 0.001) and percentage of positive biopsy cores (P = 0.042) were significant independent predictors of intervention with curative intent. When the PSA doubling time was added to the model it became a significant predictor (P = 0.018), with percentage positive biopsy cores (P = 0.022) and age (P < 0.001). Therapy with curative intent is common in contemporary patients with prostate cancer who initially choose watchful waiting. Age and percentage positive biopsy cores are independent predictors of such intervention, with PSA doubling time also an independent predictor.
引用
收藏
页码:510 / 515
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Deferred treatment of clinically localized low-grade prostate cancer: Actual 10-year and projected 15-year follow-up of the Karolinska series [J].
Adolfsson, J ;
Steineck, G ;
Hedlund, PO .
UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (05) :722-726
[2]   Competing risk analysis of men aged 55 to 74 years at diagnosis managed conservatively for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Albertsen, PC ;
Hanley, JA ;
Gleason, DF ;
Barry, MJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :975-980
[3]   LONG-TERM SURVIVAL AMONG MEN WITH CONSERVATIVELY TREATED LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
ALBERTSEN, PC ;
FRYBACK, DG ;
STORER, BE ;
KOLON, TF ;
FINE, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (08) :626-631
[4]  
Amling CL, 1998, MAYO CLIN PROC, V73, P401
[5]  
Borre M, 1997, CANCER, V80, P917
[6]   Expectant management of nonpalpable prostate cancer with curative intent: Preliminary results [J].
Carter, HB ;
Walsh, PC ;
Landis, P ;
Epstein, JI .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (03) :1231-1234
[7]   LONGITUDINAL EVALUATION OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LEVELS IN MEN WITH AND WITHOUT PROSTATE DISEASE [J].
CARTER, HB ;
PEARSON, JD ;
METTER, J ;
BRANT, LJ ;
CHAN, DW ;
ANDRES, R ;
FOZARD, JL ;
WALSH, PC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 267 (16) :2215-2220
[8]  
Chodak G, 1994, Can J Oncol, V4 Suppl 1, P20
[9]   Feasibility study: Watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression [J].
Choo, R ;
Klotz, L ;
Danjoux, C ;
Morton, GC ;
DeBoer, G ;
Szumacher, E ;
Fleshner, N ;
Bunting, P ;
Hruby, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04) :1664-1669
[10]   A PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF PLASMA PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN FOR DETECTION OF PROSTATIC-CANCER [J].
GANN, PH ;
HENNEKENS, CH ;
STAMPFER, MJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (04) :289-294