Local diagnostics to estimate density-induced sea level variations over topography and along coastlines

被引:62
作者
Bingham, R. J. [1 ]
Hughes, C. W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Geosci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Natl Oceanog Ctr, Liverpool L3 5DA, Merseyside, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
NORTH-ATLANTIC; TIDE GAUGES; OCEAN; VARIABILITY; RISE; CIRCULATION; SURFACE; MODEL; MASS;
D O I
10.1029/2011JC007276
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
070403 [天体物理学];
摘要
In the open ocean, sea level variability is primarily steric in origin. Steric sea level is given by the depth integral of the density field, raising the question of how tide gauges, which are situated in very shallow water, feel deep ocean variability. Here this question is examined in a high-resolution global ocean model. By considering a series of assumptions we show that if we wish to reconstruct coastal sea level using only local density information, then the best assumption we can make is one of no horizontal pressure gradient, and therefore no geostrophic flow, at the seafloor. Coastal sea level can then be determined using density at the ocean's floor. When attempting to discriminate between mass and volume components of sea level measured by tide gauges, the conventional approach is to take steric height at deep-ocean sites close to the tide gauges as an estimate of the steric component. We find that with steric height computed at 3000 m this approach only works well in the equatorial band of the Atlantic and Pacific eastern boundaries. In most cases the steric correction can be improved by calculating steric height closer to shore, with the best results obtained in the depth range 500-1000 m. Yet, for western boundaries, large discrepancies remain. Our results therefore suggest that on time scales up to about 5 years, and perhaps longer, the presence of boundary currents means that the conventional steric correction to tide gauges may not be valid in many places.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
The relationship between sea-level and bottom pressure variability in an eddy permitting ocean model [J].
Bingham, Rory J. ;
Hughes, Chris W. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2008, 35 (03)
[2]
Sea level rise during past 40 years determined from satellite and in situ observations [J].
Cabanes, C ;
Cazenave, A ;
Le Provost, C .
SCIENCE, 2001, 294 (5543) :840-842
[3]
Contributions of wind forcing and surface heating to interannual sea level variations in the Atlantic Ocean [J].
Cabanes, Cecile ;
Huck, Thierry ;
De Verdiere, Alain Colin .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY, 2006, 36 (09) :1739-1750
[4]
Church J, 2011, J CLIMATOL, V17, P2609
[5]
A 20th century acceleration in global sea-level rise [J].
Church, JA ;
White, NJ .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2006, 33 (01)
[6]
PRESSURE FIELD ALONG THE WESTERN MARGIN OF THE NORTH-ATLANTIC [J].
CSANADY, GT .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1979, 84 (NC8) :4905-4915
[8]
Interdecadal sea level fluctuations at Hawaii [J].
Firing, YL ;
Merrifield, MA ;
Schroeder, TA ;
Qiu, B .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY, 2004, 34 (11) :2514-2524
[9]
Coherent multidecadal variability in North Atlantic sea level [J].
Frankcombe, L. M. ;
Dijkstra, H. A. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 36