Relationship between hand size, grip strength and dynamometer position in women

被引:11
作者
Fiebert, IM [1 ]
Roach, KE [1 ]
Fromdahl, JW [1 ]
Moyer, JD [1 ]
Pfeiffer, FF [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Div Phys Therapy, Coral Gables, FL 33146 USA
关键词
grip; Jamar dynamometer; grip strength; hand size;
D O I
10.3233/BMR-1998-10305
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between hand size and grip strength at various handle positions using the Jamar handheld dynamometer in females. Eighty-eight female physical therapy students between the ages of 20 and 40 were recruited. Subjects were weighed and their height measured. Right hand size was determined by measuring from the distal tip of the third digit to the radiocarpal joint with a tape measure. Subjects were divided into two groups by hand size (< 7.0 and greater than or equal to 7.0 inches). The order of handle positions was randomly selected. Subjects were seated according to the American Society of Hand Therapists' recommended testing position with shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated, elbow flexed to 90 degrees and forearm and wrist in neutral. Subjects maximally squeezed the handle of the dynamometer with the right hand for 3 s. This process was repeated three times at each handle position. A repeated measures ANOVA was performed comparing the change in average grip strength between position 2, 3 and 4 for small and large hands. The mean age of the two groups were similar (25.96 vs. 25.89, p = 0.95). Subjects with smaller hands were shorter (61.7 vs. 65.5 inches, p = 0.0001) and produced lower grip strengths than those with large hands at all positions (p = 0.0084). Height and hand size were strongly correlated (r = 0.74, p = 0.0001) as were height and weight (r = 0.66, p = 0.0001) and weight and hand size (r = 59, p = 0.0001). Height was the most strongly correlated with grip strength at all positions followed by hand size then weight. Age was shown not to be significantly correlated with grip strength in this study. These findings suggest that handle position 2 and 3 produce similar grip strength measurements even in women with smaller hands. Position 4 is significantly worse than positions 2 and 3. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 142
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
BALOGUN JA, 1991, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V72, P280
[2]   NORMAL VALUES FOR HANDGRIP STRENGTH IN 920 MEN AND WOMEN AGED OVER 65 YEARS, AND LONGITUDINAL CHANGES OVER 4 YEARS IN 620 SURVIVORS [J].
BASSEY, EJ ;
HARRIES, UJ .
CLINICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 84 (03) :331-337
[3]  
BECHTOL CO, 1954, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V36, P832
[4]  
FESS EE, 1982, J HAND SURG-AM, V7, P308
[5]  
Fess EE, 1981, Clinical Assessment Recommendations
[6]  
Fiebert IM, 1995, PHYS OCCUP THER GERI, V13, P27
[7]   Which setting of the dynamometer provides maximal grip strength? [J].
Firrell, JC ;
Crain, GM .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 21A (03) :397-401
[8]   GRIP-STRENGTH MEASUREMENT - A COMPARISON OF 3 JAMAR DYNAMOMETERS [J].
FLOODJOY, M ;
MATHIOWETZ, V .
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 1987, 7 (04) :235-243
[9]   GRIP STRENGTH AND HAND POSITION OF THE DYNAMOMETER IN 204 FINNISH ADULTS [J].
HARKONEN, R ;
PIIRTOMAA, M ;
ALARANTA, H .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 1993, 18B (01) :129-132
[10]  
*JA PREST CORP, JAMAR PC5030J1 HYDR