Sensitivity of serum tissue transglutaminase antibodies for endomysial antibody positive and negative coeliac disease

被引:56
作者
Dickey, W [1 ]
McMillan, SA
Hughes, DF
机构
[1] Altnagelvin Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Londonderry BT47 6SB, North Ireland
[2] Altnagelvin Hosp, Dept Histopathol, Londonderry BT47 6SB, North Ireland
[3] Queens Univ Belfast, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[4] Royal Grp Hosp, Reg Immunol Lab, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
coeliac disease; diagnosis; endomysial antibodies; tissue transglutaminase antibodies;
D O I
10.1080/003655201750153359
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Serum antibodies to tissue transglutaminase (tTGA) are reported to have high sensitivity and specificity for coeliac disease and to correlate closely with endomysial antibodies (EmA). We assessed their performance in a coeliac population with a high proportion of EmA-negative patients, who have been under-represented in previous studies. Methods: We used a commercial ELISA kit to test for IgA class tTGA in sera from a population of 73 untreated coeliac patients with normal serum IgA and a high percentage (19%) EmA-negative, taking 58 patients with normal duodenal biopsies as controls. EmA was measured using indirect immunofluorescence. Results: Forty-six (63%) patients with villous atrophy (VA) had both tTGA and EmA. However, when considered separately, sensitivities of tTGA and EmA for VA were similar (75% versus 81%) and both had high specificity (98% versus 97%). As 9 patients were tTGA-positive only and 13 had EmA only, selection of patients for biopsy on the presence of either antibody would have had a sensitivity of 93% (68 of 73), with 5 (7%) patients seronegative for both. Conclusion: Although the ELISA tTGA assay is more convenient than EmA testing, it offers no advantages in sensitivity or specificity if used in isolation. However, incomplete concordance between EmA and tTGA positivity means that combination screening with both assays offers higher sensitivity, as almost a third of patients have only one antibody. As some coeliac patients with normal serum IgA are negative for both antibodies, biopsies should still be performed in seronegative individuals deemed at high risk for coeliac disease.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 514
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Correlation between tissue transglutaminase antibodies and endomysium antibodies as diagnostic markers of coeliac disease [J].
Amin, M ;
Eckhardt, T ;
Kapitza, S ;
Fleckenstein, B ;
Jung, G ;
Seissler, J ;
Weichert, H ;
Richter, T ;
Stern, M ;
Mothes, T .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1999, 282 (1-2) :219-225
[2]   Comparison of tissue transglutaminase-specific antibody assays with established antibody measurements for coeliac disease [J].
Bazzigaluppi, E ;
Lampasona, V ;
Barera, G ;
Venerando, A ;
Bianchi, C ;
Chiumello, G ;
Bonifacio, E ;
Bosi, E .
JOURNAL OF AUTOIMMUNITY, 1999, 12 (01) :51-56
[3]  
Biagi F, 1999, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V94, P2187
[4]   SELECTIVE IGA DEFICIENCY AND CELIAC-DISEASE [J].
COLLIN, P ;
MAKI, M ;
KEYRILAINEN, O ;
HALLSTROM, O ;
REUNALA, T ;
PASTERNACK, A .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1992, 27 (05) :367-371
[5]  
Dickey W, 2000, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V35, P181
[6]  
Dickey W, 1999, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V94, P2182
[7]   Autoantibodies to tissue transglutaminase as predictors of celiac disease [J].
Dieterich, W ;
Laag, E ;
Schöpper, H ;
Volta, U ;
Ferguson, A ;
Gillett, H ;
Riecken, EO ;
Schuppan, D .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 115 (06) :1317-1321
[8]   Identification of tissue transglutaminase as the autoantigen of celiac disease [J].
Dieterich, W ;
Ehnis, T ;
Bauer, M ;
Donner, P ;
Volta, U ;
Riecken, EO ;
Schuppan, D .
NATURE MEDICINE, 1997, 3 (07) :797-801
[9]   IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase as a diagnostic marker of gluten sensitive enteropathy [J].
Lock, RJ ;
Pitcher, MCL ;
Unsworth, DJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1999, 52 (04) :274-277
[10]   GLUTEN, MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX, AND THE SMALL-INTESTINE - A MOLECULAR AND IMMUNOBIOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE SPECTRUM OF GLUTEN SENSITIVITY (CELIAC SPRUE) [J].
MARSH, MN .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1992, 102 (01) :330-354