A placebo-controlled study of lamotrigine and gabapentin monotherapy in refractory mood disorders

被引:328
作者
Frye, MA
Ketter, TA
Kimbrell, TA
Dunn, RT
Speer, AM
Osuch, EA
Luckenbaugh, DA
Corá-Locatelli, G
Leverich, GS
Post, RM
机构
[1] NIMH, Biol Psychiat Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NIMH, Clin Sci Lab, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Univ Arkansas, Sch Med, Little Rock, AR 72204 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00004714-200012000-00004
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
There is a pressing need for additional treatment options for refractory mood disorders. This controlled comparative study evaluated the efficacy of lamotrigine (LTG) and gabapentin (GBP) monotherapy versus placebo (PLC). Thirty-one patients with refractory bipolar and unipolar mood disorders participated in a double-blind, randomized, crossover series of three 6-week monotherapy evaluations including LTG, GBP, and PLC. There was a standardized blinded titration to assess clinical efficacy or to determine the maximum tolerated daily dose (LTG 500 mg or GBP 4,800 mg). The primary outcome measure was the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI) for Bipolar Illness as supplemented by other standard rating instruments. The mean doses at week 6 were 274 +/- 128 mg for LTG and 3,987 +/- 856 mg for GBP. Response rates (CGI ratings of much or very much improved) were the following: LTG, 52% (16/31); GBP, 26% (8/31); and PLC, 23% (7/31) (Cochran's Q = 6.952, df = 2, N = 31, p = 0.031). Post hoc Q differences (df = 1, N = 31) were the following: LTG versus GBP (Q, 5.33, p = 0.011); LTG versus PLC (Q(diff) = 4.76, p = 0.022); and GBP versus PLC (Q(diff) = 0.08,p = 0.70). With respect to anticonvulsant dose and gender, there was no difference between the responders and the nonresponders. The agents mere generally well tolerated. This controlled investigation preliminarily suggests the efficacy of LTG in treatment-refractory affectively ill patients. Further definition of responsive subtypes and the role of these medications in the treatment of mood disorders requires additional study.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 614
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Gabapentin for treatment of bipolar and schizoaffective disorders
    Bennett, J
    Goldman, WT
    Suppes, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 17 (02) : 141 - 142
  • [2] Lamotrigine reduces total postoperative analgesic requirement: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study
    Bonicalzi, V
    Canavero, S
    Cerutti, F
    Piazza, M
    Clemente, M
    Chio, A
    [J]. SURGERY, 1997, 122 (03) : 567 - 570
  • [3] EFFICACY OF DIVALPROEX VS LITHIUM AND PLACEBO IN THE TREATMENT OF MANIA
    BOWDEN, CL
    BRUGGER, AM
    SWANN, AC
    CALABRESE, JR
    JANICAK, PG
    PETTY, F
    DILSAVER, SC
    DAVIS, JM
    RUSH, AJ
    SMALL, JG
    GARZATREVINO, ES
    RISCH, SC
    GOODNICK, PJ
    MORRIS, DD
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (12): : 918 - 924
  • [4] A double-blind placebo-controlled study of lamotrigine monotherapy in outpatients with bipolar I depression
    Calabrese, JR
    Bowden, CL
    Sachs, GS
    Ascher, JA
    Monaghan, E
    Rudd, GD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 60 (02) : 79 - +
  • [5] Calabrese JR, 1996, AM J PSYCHIAT, V153, P1236
  • [6] CALABRESE JR, 2000, BIPOLAR MED MECH ACT
  • [7] CHADWICK D, 1990, LANCET, V335, P1114
  • [8] Chouinard G, 1998, CAN J PSYCHIAT, V43, P305
  • [9] CORALOCATELLI G, 1998, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V59, P400
  • [10] Preliminary evidence of the reliability and validity of the prospective life-chart methodology (LCM-p)
    Denicoff, KD
    SmithJackson, EE
    Disney, ER
    Suddath, RL
    Leverich, GS
    Post, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1997, 31 (05) : 593 - 603