Competition amongst Eph receptors regulates contact inhibition of locomotion and invasiveness in prostate cancer cells

被引:198
作者
Astin, Jonathan W. [1 ]
Batson, Jennifer [1 ]
Kadir, Shereen [1 ]
Charlet, Jessica [1 ]
Persad, Raj A. [3 ]
Gillatt, David [3 ]
Oxley, Jon D. [4 ]
Nobes, Catherine D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Biochem, Bristol BS8 1TD, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Physiol & Pharmacol, Bristol BS8 1TD, Avon, England
[3] Southmead Hosp, Bristol Urol Inst, Bristol BS10 5NB, Avon, England
[4] Southmead Hosp, Dept Cellular Pathol, Bristol BS10 5NB, Avon, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; TYROSINE KINASE; TUMOR-CELLS; MIGRATION; MOTILITY; EXPRESSION; INDUCTION; CARCINOMA; ROLES; PROLIFERATION;
D O I
10.1038/ncb2122
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Metastatic cancer cells typically fail to halt migration on contact with non-cancer cells. This invasiveness is in contrast to normal mesenchymal cells that retract on contact with another cell. Why cancer cells are defective in contact inhibition of locomotion is not understood. Here, we analyse the dynamics of prostate cancer cell lines co-cultured with fibroblasts, and demonstrate that a combinatorial code of Eph receptor activation dictates whether cell migration will be contact inhibited. The unimpeded migration of metastatic PC-3 cells towards fibroblasts is dependent on activation of EphB3 and EphB4 by ephrin-B2, which we show activates Cdc42 and cell migration. Knockdown of EphB3 and EphB4 restores contact inhibition of locomotion to PC-3 cells. Conversely, homotypic collisions between two cancer cells results in contact inhibition of locomotion, mediated by EphA-Rho-Rho kinase (ROCK) signalling. Thus, the migration of cancer cells can switch from restrained to invasive, depending on the Eph-receptor profile of the cancer cell and the reciprocal ephrin ligands expressed by neighbouring cells.
引用
收藏
页码:1194 / U175
页数:33
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] CONTACT INHIBITION AND MALIGNANCY
    ABERCROMBIE, M
    [J]. NATURE, 1979, 281 (5729) : 259 - 262
  • [2] ABERCROMBIE M, 1970, IN VITRO CELL DEV B, V6, P128
  • [3] ABERCROMBIE M, 1978, MED BIOL, V56, P299
  • [4] Ephrin-B2 regulates endothelial cell morphology and motility independently of Eph-receptor binding
    Bochenek, Magdalena L.
    Dickinson, Sarah
    Astin, Jonathan W.
    Adams, Ralf H.
    Nobes, Catherine D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE, 2010, 123 (08) : 1235 - 1246
  • [5] BOSTWICK DG, 1995, PATHOL RES PRACT, V191, P850, DOI 10.1016/S0344-0338(11)80967-2
  • [6] Bracke ME, 1997, EUR J CELL BIOL, V74, P342
  • [7] Contact inhibition of locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration
    Carmona-Fontaine, Carlos
    Matthews, Helen K.
    Kuriyama, Sei
    Moreno, Mauricio
    Dunn, Graham A.
    Parsons, Maddy
    Stern, Claudio D.
    Mayor, Roberto
    [J]. NATURE, 2008, 456 (7224) : 957 - 961
  • [8] Profiling and verification of gene expression patterns in normal and malignant human prostate tissues by cDNA microarray analysis
    Chaib, H
    Cockrell, EK
    Rubin, MA
    Macoska, JA
    [J]. NEOPLASIA, 2001, 3 (01): : 43 - 52
  • [9] EphB ephrin-B interactions suppress colorectal cancer progression by compartmentalizing tumor cells
    Cortina, Carme
    Palomo-Ponce, Sergio
    Iglesias, Mar
    Fernandez-Masip, Juan Luis
    Vivancos, Ana
    Whissell, Gavin
    Huma, Mireia
    Peiro, Nerea
    Gallego, Lourdes
    Jonkheer, Suzanne
    Davy, Alice
    Lloreta, Josep
    Sancho, Elena
    Batlle, Eduard
    [J]. NATURE GENETICS, 2007, 39 (11) : 1376 - 1383
  • [10] Cdc42 - the centre of polarity
    Etienne-Manneville, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE, 2004, 117 (08) : 1291 - 1300