Bottom-up approach to moduli dynamics in heavy gravitino scenario: Superpotential, soft terms, and sparticle mass spectrum

被引:188
作者
Endo, M [1 ]
Yamaguchi, M
Yoshioka, K
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Dept Phys, Sendai, Miyagi 9808578, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Dept Phys, Fukuoka 8128581, Japan
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW D | 2005年 / 72卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.72.015004
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The physics of moduli fields is examined in the scenario where the gravitino is relatively heavy with mass of order 10 TeV, which is favored in view of the severe gravitino problem. The form of the moduli superpotential is shown to be determined, if one imposes a phenomenological requirement that no physical CP phase arise in gaugino masses from conformal anomaly mediation. This bottom-up approach allows only two types of superpotential, each of which can have its origins in a fundamental underlying theory such as superstring. One superpotential is the sum of an exponential and a constant, which is identical to that obtained by Kachru et al. (KKLT), and the other is the racetrack superpotential with two exponentials. The general form of soft supersymmetry-breaking masses is derived, and the pattern of the superparticle mass spectrum in the minimal supersymmetric standard model is discussed with the KKLT-type superpotential. It is shown that the moduli mediation and the anomaly mediation make comparable contributions to the soft masses. At the weak scale, the gaugino masses are rather degenerate compared to the minimal supergravity, which bring characteristic features on the superparticle masses. In particular, the lightest neutralino, which often constitutes the lightest superparticle and thus a dark matter candidate, is a considerable admixture of gauginos and Higgsinos. We also find a small mass hierarchy among the moduli, gravitino, and superpartners of the standard-model fields. Cosmological implications of the scenario are briefly described.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 154 条
[1]   A precision measurement of the mass of the top quark [J].
Abazov, VM ;
Abbott, B ;
Abdesselam, A ;
Abolins, M ;
Abramov, V ;
Acharya, BS ;
Adams, DL ;
Adams, M ;
Ahmed, SN ;
Alexeev, GD ;
Alton, A ;
Alves, GA ;
Arnoud, Y ;
Avila, C ;
Babintsev, VV ;
Babukhadia, L ;
Bacon, TC ;
Baden, A ;
Baffioni, S ;
Baldin, B ;
Balm, PW ;
Banerjee, S ;
Barberis, E ;
Baringer, P ;
Barreto, J ;
Bartlett, JF ;
Bassler, U ;
Bauer, D ;
Bean, A ;
Beaudette, F ;
Begel, M ;
Belyaev, A ;
Beri, SB ;
Bernardi, G ;
Bertram, I ;
Besson, A ;
Beuselinck, R ;
Bezzubov, VA ;
Bhat, PC ;
Bhatnagar, V ;
Bhattacharjee, M ;
Blazey, G ;
Blekman, F ;
Blessing, S ;
Boehnlein, A ;
Bojko, NI ;
Bolton, TA ;
Borcherding, F ;
Bos, K ;
Bose, T .
NATURE, 2004, 429 (6992) :638-642
[2]   EDM constraints in supersymmetric theories [J].
Abel, S ;
Khalil, S ;
Lebedev, O .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS B, 2001, 606 (1-2) :151-182
[3]   BIG-BANG PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND PREGALACTIC NUCLEOSYNTHESIS OF LIGHT-ELEMENTS [J].
AUDOUZE, J ;
LINDLEY, D ;
SILK, J .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1985, 293 (02) :L53-L57
[4]  
Bagger J, 2001, J HIGH ENERGY PHYS
[5]  
Bagger JA, 2000, J HIGH ENERGY PHYS
[6]  
BALESTRA F, 1984, SOV J NUCL PHYS+, V39, P626
[7]  
Banks T, 2004, J HIGH ENERGY PHYS
[8]   COSMOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF DYNAMICAL SUPERSYMMETRY BREAKING [J].
BANKS, T ;
KAPLAN, DB ;
NELSON, AE .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1994, 49 (02) :779-787
[9]   COPING WITH STRONGLY COUPLED STRING THEORY [J].
BANKS, T ;
DINE, M .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1994, 50 (12) :7454-7466
[10]   Nonperturbative corrections to the Kahler potential [J].
Barreiro, T ;
de Carlos, B ;
Copeland, EJ .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1998, 57 (12) :7354-7360