Foreshocks explained by cascades of triggered seismicity

被引:173
作者
Helmstetter, A [1 ]
Sornette, D
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Geophys & Planetary Phys, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Earth & Space Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Nice, CNRS, UMR 6622, Phys Mat Condensee Lab, F-06034 Nice, France
关键词
foreshock; aftershock; ETAS; inverse Omori law; triggering; magnitude distribution;
D O I
10.1029/2003JB002409
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
[1] The observation of foreshocks preceding large earthquakes and the suggestion that foreshocks have specific properties that may be used to distinguish them from other earthquakes have raised the hope that large earthquakes may be predictable. Among proposed anomalous properties are the larger proportion than normal of large versus small foreshocks, the power law acceleration of seismicity rate as a function of time to the mainshock, and the spatial migration of foreshocks toward the mainshock when averaging over many sequences. Using southern California seismicity, we show that these properties and others arise naturally from the simple model that any earthquake may trigger other earthquakes, without arbitrary distinction between foreshocks, aftershocks, and mainshocks. We find that foreshock precursory properties are independent of the mainshock size. This implies that earthquakes ( large or small) are predictable to the same degree as seismicity rate is predictable from past seismicity by taking into account cascades of triggering. The cascades of triggering give rise naturally to long-range and long-time interactions, which can explain the observations of correlations in seismicity over surprisingly large length scales.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Occurrence patterns of foreshocks to large earthquakes in the western United States [J].
Abercrombie, RE ;
Mori, J .
NATURE, 1996, 381 (6580) :303-307
[2]  
[Anonymous], RISK
[3]   RELATION BETWEEN EARTHQUAKE FORESHOCKS STRESS AND MAINSHOCKS [J].
BERG, E .
NATURE, 1968, 219 (5159) :1141-&
[4]   Accelerating seismicity and stress accumulation before large earthquakes [J].
Bowman, DD ;
King, GCP .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2001, 28 (21) :4039-4042
[5]   An observational test of the critical earthquake concept [J].
Bowman, DD ;
Ouillon, G ;
Sammis, CG ;
Sornette, A ;
Sornette, D .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1998, 103 (B10) :24359-24372
[6]   A simple and testable model for earthquake clustering [J].
Console, R ;
Murru, M .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2001, 106 (B5) :8699-8711
[7]   Implications of fault constitutive properties for earthquake prediction [J].
Dieterich, JH ;
Kilgore, B .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (09) :3787-3794
[8]   Detailed observations of California foreshock sequences: Implications for the earthquake initiation process [J].
Dodge, DA ;
Beroza, GC ;
Ellsworth, WL .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1996, 101 (B10) :22371-22392
[9]   Triggering of the 1999 MW 7.1 Hector Mine earthquake by aftershocks of the 1992 MW 7.3 Landers earthquake -: art. no. 2190 [J].
Felzer, KR ;
Becker, TW ;
Abercrombie, RE ;
Ekström, G ;
Rice, JR .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2002, 107 (B9)
[10]  
HARRIS RA, 2001, INT HDB EARTHQUAKE E, pCH73