Effect of breast augmentation on the accuracy of mammography and cancer characteristics

被引:101
作者
Miglioretti, DL
Rutter, CM
Geller, BM
Cutter, G
Barlow, WE
Rosenberg, R
Weaver, DL
Taplin, SH
Ballard-Barbash, R
Carney, PA
Yankaskas, BC
Kerlikowske, K
机构
[1] Grp Hlth Cooperat Puget Sound, Ctr Hlth Studies, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Canc Res & Biostat, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[5] Univ Nevada, Sch Med, Ctr Res Design & Stat Methods, Appl Res Facil, Reno, NV 89557 USA
[6] Univ New Mexico, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[7] NCI, Appl Res Program, Dept Canc Control & Populat Sci, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[8] Dartmouth Coll Sch Med, Dept Community & Family Med, Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Norris Cotton Canc Ctr, Lebanon, NH USA
[9] Univ N Carolina, Dept Radiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[10] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Vet Affairs, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[11] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med & Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2004年 / 291卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.291.4.442
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Breast augmentation is not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer; however, implants may interfere with the detection of breast cancer thereby delaying cancer diagnosis in women with augmentation. Objective To determine whether mammography accuracy and tumor characteristics are different for women with and without augmentation. Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective cohort of 137 women with augmentation and 685 women without augmentation diagnosed with breast cancer between January 1, 1995, and October 15, 2002, matched (1:5) by age, race/ethnicity, previous mammography screening, and mammography registry, and 10533 women with augmentation and 974915 women without augmentation and without breast cancer among 7 mammography registries in Denver, Colo; Lebanon, NH; Albuquerque, NM; Chapel Hill, NC; San Francisco, Calif; Seattle, Wash; and Burlington, Vt. Main Outcome Measures Comparison between women with and without augmentation of mammography performance measures and cancer characteristics, including invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ, tumor stage, nodal status, size, grade, and estrogen-receptor status. Results Among asymptomatic women, the sensitivity of screening mammography based on the final assessment was lower in women with breast augmentation vs women without (45.0% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 29.3%-61.5%] vs 66.8% [95% CI, 60.4%-72.8%]; P=.008), and specificity was slightly higher in women with augmentation (97.7% [95% CI, 97.4%-98.0%] vs 96.7% [95% CI, 96.6%-96.7%]; P<.001). Among symptomatic women, both sensitivity and specificity were lower for women with augmentation compared with women without but these differences were not significant. Tumors were of similar stage, size, estrogen-receptor status, and nodal status but tended to be lower grade (P=.052) for women with breast augmentation vs without. Conclusions Breast augmentation decreases the sensitivity of screening mammography among asymptomatic women but does not increase the false-positive rate. Despite the lower accuracy of mammography in women with augmentation, the prognostic characteristics of tumors are not influenced by augmentation.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 450
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
*AM SOC PLAST SURG, 2002 QUICK FACTS COS
[2]   Breast cancer surveillance consortium: A national mammography screening and outcomes database [J].
BallardBarbash, R ;
Taplin, SH ;
Yankaskas, BC ;
Ernster, VL ;
Rosenberg, RD ;
Carney, PA ;
Barlow, WE ;
Geller, BM ;
Kerlikowske, K ;
Edwards, BK ;
Lynch, CF ;
Urban, N ;
Key, CR ;
Poplack, SP ;
Worden, JK ;
Kessler, LG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (04) :1001-1008
[3]   BREAST-CANCER DIAGNOSIS AND SURVIVAL IN WOMEN WITH AND WITHOUT BREAST IMPLANTS [J].
BIRDSELL, DC ;
JENKINS, H ;
BERKEL, H .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1993, 92 (05) :795-800
[4]  
BRIGHT RA, 1993, J LONG-TERM EFF MED, V3, P81
[5]   Breast cancer following augmentation mammoplasty (United States) [J].
Brinton L.A. ;
Lubin J.H. ;
Burich M.C. ;
Colton T. ;
Brown S.L. ;
Hoover R.N. .
Cancer Causes & Control, 2000, 11 (9) :819-827
[6]   Breast enlargement and reduction. Results from a breast cancer case-control study [J].
Brinton, LA ;
Malone, KE ;
Coates, RJ ;
Schoenberg, JB ;
Swanson, CA ;
Daling, JR ;
Stanford, JL .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1996, 97 (02) :269-275
[7]   BREAST-CANCER AFTER BREAST AUGMENTATION WITH SILICONE IMPLANTS [J].
CAHAN, AC ;
ASHIKARI, P ;
PRESSMAN, P ;
CODY, H ;
HOFFMAN, S ;
SHERMAN, JE .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 2 (02) :121-125
[8]   THE DETECTION OF BREAST-CANCER AFTER AUGMENTATION MAMMAPLASTY [J].
CARLSON, GW ;
CURLEY, SA ;
MARTIN, JE ;
FORNAGE, BD ;
AMES, FC .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1993, 91 (05) :837-840
[9]  
Carney PA, 2003, ANN INTERN MED, V138, P168, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008
[10]  
CLARK CP, 1993, CANCER, V72, P2170, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19931001)72:7<2170::AID-CNCR2820720717>3.0.CO