Hyperconjugation not steric repulsion leads to the staggered structure of ethane

被引:462
作者
Pophristic, V [1 ]
Goodman, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Wright & Rieman Chem Labs, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/35079036
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Many molecules can rotate internally around one or more of their bonds so that during a full 360 degrees rotation, they will change between unstable and relatively stable conformations. Ethane is the textbook example of a molecule exhibiting such behaviour: as one of its two methyl (CH3) groups rotates once around the central carbon-carbon bond, the molecule will alternate three times between an unstable eclipsed conformation and the preferred staggered conformation. This structural preference is usually attributed to steric effects(1-7); that is, while ethane rotates towards an eclipsed structure, the electrons in C-H bonds on the different C atoms are drawing closer to each other and therefore experience increased repulsion, introducing a rotation barrier that destabilizes the eclipsed structure(8,9). Stabilization of the staggered structure through rotation-induced weakening of the central C-C bond(10) and hyperconjugation(11,12) has been considered to be involved, but evaluation of the contributions of these effects to ethane's internal rotation barrier and conformational preference remains difficult(13,14). Here we report a series of ethane structure optimizations, where successive removal of different interactions indicates that ethane's staggered conformation is the result of preferential stabilization through hyperconjugation. Removal of hyperconjugation interactions yields the eclipsed structure as the preferred conformation, whereas repulsive forces, either present or absent, have no influence on the preference for a staggered conformation.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 568
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Natural bond orbital analysis of steric interactions
    Badenhoop, JK
    Weinhold, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 107 (14) : 5406 - 5421
  • [2] Badenhoop JK, 1999, INT J QUANTUM CHEM, V72, P269, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-461X(1999)72:4<269::AID-QUA9>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-8
  • [4] ORIGIN OF ROTATION AND INVERSION BARRIERS
    BADER, RFW
    CHEESEMAN, JR
    LAIDIG, KE
    WIBERG, KB
    BRENEMAN, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1990, 112 (18) : 6530 - 6536
  • [5] QUANTUM-MECHANICAL STUDIES ON THE ORIGIN OF BARRIERS TO INTERNAL-ROTATION ABOUT SINGLE BONDS
    BRUNCK, TK
    WEINHOLD, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1979, 101 (07) : 1700 - 1709
  • [6] Carey F.A., 2000, Organic Chemistry
  • [7] CAREY FA, 2000, ADV ORGANIC CHEM
  • [8] STUDY OF ETHANE INTERNAL-ROTATION BARRIER
    CHRISTIANSEN, PA
    PALKE, WE
    [J]. CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1975, 31 (03) : 462 - 466
  • [9] Frisch M.J., 1998, GAUSSIAN 98
  • [10] Glendening E. D., 1996, NBO 4 0