Ultrasound criteria for ductal invasive breast cancer are modified by age, tumor size, and axillary lymph node status

被引:35
作者
Watermann, DO
Tempfer, CB
Hefler, LA
Parat, C
Stickeler, E
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Med Ctr, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Vienna, Sch Med, Vienna, Austria
关键词
age; breast-neoplasms; grading; image analysis; lymph-node; multivariate analysis; tumor-size; ultrasound;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-004-1478-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose. To evaluate the influence of distinct clinicopathological parameters on ultrasound criteria for ductal invasive breast cancer. Patients and methods. The hardcopy prints of 337 ductal invasive breast cancers were analyzed. Ten ultrasound criteria (shape, orientation, echogenicity, echo pattern, calcifications, margin, margin contour, lesion boundary, surrounding tissue, and posterior acoustic features) were defined and correlated to age, tumor size, axillary lymph node status, and histological grading in a multivariate analysis. Results. Tumors in women less than or equal to50 years displayed more often an indistinct margin (p = 0.003) and an enhanced/indifferent posterior ultrasound transmission (p = 0.008). Tumors in an advanced T-stage showed more frequently an irregular shape ( p = 0.006), an orientation parallel to the skin ( p = 0.01), hypoechogenicity ( p < 0.0001), and less often calcifications ( p = 0.002). A positive axillary lymph node status was significantly correlated to oval/round shape ( p = 0.004), hyper-/isoechogenicity ( p = 0.001), and a homogeneous echo pattern ( p = 0.002). Grading showed no correlation to the examined ultrasound criteria. Conclusion. Breast ultrasound criteria, which are used to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions, are influenced by age, size and lymph node status. These clinical conditions should be considered in the ultrasound diagnosis of breast lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 133
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
American College of Radiology (ACR), 2003, ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: Breast Imaging Atlas, V4th ed.
[2]
[Anonymous], 1997, AJCC CANC STAGING MA
[3]
[Anonymous], 1981, HIST TYP BREAST TUM
[4]
Sonography of solid breast lesions: Observer variability of lesion description and assessment [J].
Baker, JA ;
Kornguth, PJ ;
Soo, MS ;
Walsh, R ;
Mengoni, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (06) :1621-1625
[5]
HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND PROGNOSIS IN BREAST CANCER - A STUDY OF 1409 CASES OF WHICH 359 HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED FOR 15 YEARS [J].
BLOOM, HJG ;
RICHARDSON, WW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1957, 11 (03) :359-&
[6]
Prospective sonographic study of 3093 breast tumors [J].
Chao, TC ;
Lo, YF ;
Chen, SC ;
Chen, MF .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 1999, 18 (05) :363-370
[7]
Chao TC, 1999, J ULTRAS MED, V18, P371
[8]
CLARK G, 2000, DIS BREAST, V2, P489
[9]
Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: Detection with screening US - Diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics [J].
Kolb, TM ;
Lichy, J ;
Newhouse, JH .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (01) :191-199
[10]
Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast [J].
Lamb, PM ;
Perry, NM ;
Vinnicombe, SJ ;
Wells, CA .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 55 (01) :40-44