Comparison of dentine hypersensitivity in selected occidental and oriental populations

被引:35
作者
Gillam, DG
Seo, HS
Newman, HN
Bulman, JS
机构
[1] Univ London, Eastman Dent Inst Oral Hlth Care Sci, Dept Periodontol, London, England
[2] Univ London, Eastman Dent Inst Oral Hlth Care Sci, Dept Transcultural Oral Hlth, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00631.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Epidemiological data on dentine hypersensitivity (DH) prevalence are limited. Few studies have compared prevalence between populations. The aim of this investigation, therefore, was to compare the perception and prevalence of DH in two distinct non-periodontal practice populations, one U.K. and one Korean. Completed questionnaires from 557 patients (230 males and 327 females, comprising 115 males and 162 females, mean age 41.7 years (s.d. = 14.36), U.K. and 115 males and 165 females, mean age 29.7 years (s.d. = 11.86), Korean) were collected. Analysis was by frequency distribution and cross-tabulation (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)). DH prevalence was similar and at levels comparable with those reported previously. Prevalence was higher in the third and fourth decades in both populations. Although there were no differences between U.K. or Korean males and U.K. or Korean females, there was a significant difference between gender reporting of DH, with more females complaining of DH than males (standard normal deviation (SND) = 4.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.1134-0.2736). DH appeared to be regarded by patients as not severe in most cases, so treatment was not generally sought. Of those who claimed to have sought treatment, a significant number had received restorative treatment. Of those patients, only 23.3% of U.K. and less than or equal to2% of Korean patients claimed to have used a desensitizing dentifrice. Pain from DH was reported as low grade (slight, occasional) occurring over 5 years in both populations. Cold appeared to be the most reported stimulus in the two populations. Less periodontal surgery had been undertaken in these two populations (12.6% U.K. and 7.1% Korean) compared with those referred to a teaching hospital periodontal department (34.5%). This compared favourably with previous findings in the general dental population (15.9%). Discomfort following hygiene therapy did not appear to last greater than or equal to 7days in either population. The results indicated that there were no significant differences between U.K.- and Korean-based populations in their perception of DH, with the exception that more females complained of sensitivity than males in both groups. Overall, DH was not considered a major dental problem by most patients in either of the populations.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 25
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Addy M, 1992, Proc Finn Dent Soc, V88 Suppl 1, P23
[2]   Prevalence of cervical dentine sensitivity in a population of patients referred to a specialist Periodontology Department [J].
Chabanski, MB ;
Gillam, DG ;
Bulman, JS ;
Newman, HN .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1996, 23 (11) :989-992
[3]  
Collaert B, 1991, Rev Belge Med Dent (1984), V46, P63
[4]   PREVALENCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF CERVICAL DENTIN HYPERSENSITIVITY IN A POPULATION IN RIO-DE-JANEIRO, BRAZIL [J].
FISCHER, C ;
FISCHER, RG ;
WENNBERG, A .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1992, 20 (05) :272-276
[5]  
Gillam DG, 1996, J DENT RES, V75, P2429
[6]  
GILLAM DG, 1995, J DENT RES, V74, P448
[7]  
Gillam DG, 1992, THESIS U EDINBURGH
[8]  
GILLAM DG, 1994, J PARODONTOLOGIE IMP, V1, P66
[9]  
KANAPKA JA, 1990, DENT CLIN N AM, V34, P545
[10]  
Murray L. E., 1994, Archives of Oral Biology, V39, p129S, DOI 10.1016/0003-9969(94)90203-8