Quality assurance experience with the randomized neuropathic bone pain trial (Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group, 96.05)

被引:10
作者
Roos, DE [1 ]
Davis, SR
Turner, SL
O'Brien, PC
Spry, NA
Burmeister, BH
Hoskin, PJ
Ball, DL
机构
[1] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] William Buckland Radiotherapy Ctr, Prahran, Vic, Australia
[3] Westmead Hosp, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[4] Newcastle Mater Misericordiae Hosp, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[5] Sir Charles Gairdner Hosp, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
[6] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Woolloongabba, Qld 4102, Australia
[7] Mt Vernon Hosp, Northwood HA6 2RN, Middx, England
[8] Peter MacCallum Canc Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
quality assurance; randomized; radiotherapy; neuropathic pain;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8140(03)00026-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 96.05 is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing a single 8 Gy with 20 Gy in five fractions of radiotherapy (RT) for neuropathic pain due to bone metastases. This paper summarizes the quality assurance (QA) activities for the first 234 patients (accrual target 270). Materials and methods: Independent audits to assess compliance with eligibility/exclusion criteria and appropriateness of treatment of the index site were conducted after each cohort of approximately 45 consecutive patients. Reported serious adverse events (SAEs) in the form of cord/cauda equina compression or pathological fracture developing at the index site were investigated and presented in batches to the Independent Data Monitoring Committee. Finally, source data verification of the RT prescription page and treatment records was undertaken for each of the first 234 patients to assess compliance with the protocol. Results: Only one patient was found conclusively not to have genuine neuropathic pain, and there were no detected 'geographical misses' with RT fields. The overall rate of detected infringements for other eligibility criteria over five audits (225 patients) was 8% with a dramatic improvement after the first audit. There has at no stage been a statistically significant difference in SAEs by randomization arm. There was a 22% rate of RT protocol variations involving ten of the 14 contributing centres, although the rate of major dose violations (more than +/- 10% from protocol dose) was only 6% with no statistically significant difference by randomization arm (P = 0.44). Conclusions: QA auditing is an essential but time-consuming component of RT trials, including those assessing palliative endpoints. Our experience confirms that all aspects should commence soon after study activation. Crown Copyright (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 212
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Fractionated radiotherapy for metastatic bone pain: Evidence-based medicine or ...? [J].
Bentzen, SM ;
Hoskin, P ;
Roos, D ;
Nielsen, OS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (03) :681-682
[2]   A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 4-GY OR 8-GY SINGLE DOSES IN THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC BONE PAIN [J].
HOSKIN, PJ ;
PRICE, P ;
EASTON, D ;
REGAN, J ;
AUSTIN, D ;
PALMER, S ;
YARNOLD, JR .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1992, 23 (02) :74-78
[3]   INFLUENCE OF A SAMPLING REVIEW PROCESS FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY QUALITY ASSURANCE IN COOPERATIVE GROUP CLINICAL-TRIALS - RESULTS OF THE RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP (RTOG) ANALYSIS [J].
MARTIN, LA ;
KRALL, JM ;
CURRAN, WJ ;
LEIBEL, SA ;
COX, JD .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1995, 36 (01) :9-14
[4]   PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF SINGLE AND MULTIFRACTION RADIOTHERAPY SCHEDULES IN THE TREATMENT OF PAINFUL BONY METASTASES [J].
PRICE, P ;
HOSKIN, PJ ;
EASTON, D ;
AUSTIN, D ;
PALMER, SG ;
YARNOLD, JR .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1986, 6 (04) :247-255
[5]  
Roos D E, 2000, Australas Radiol, V44, P303, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2000.00818.x
[6]   A role for radiotherapy in neuropathic bone pain: Preliminary response rates from a prospective trial (Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group, TROG 96.05) [J].
Roos, DE ;
O'Brien, PC ;
Smith, JG ;
Spry, NA ;
Hoskin, PJ ;
Burmeister, BH ;
Turner, SL ;
Bernshaw, DM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (04) :975-981
[7]   Continuing reluctance to use single fractions of radiotherapy for metastatic bone pain: an Australian and New Zealand practice survey and literature review [J].
Roos, DE .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2000, 56 (03) :315-322
[8]  
SUNDERLAND M, 1990, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V9, P60
[9]   A SUCCESSFUL SYSTEM OF SCIENTIFIC-DATA AUDITS FOR CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
WEISS, RB ;
VOGELZANG, NJ ;
PETERSON, BA ;
PANASCI, LC ;
CARPENTER, JT ;
GAVIGAN, M ;
SARTELL, K ;
FREI, E ;
MCINTYRE, OR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (04) :459-464