The freshwater biota of British agricultural landscapes and their sensitivity to pesticides

被引:45
作者
Biggs, Jeremy
Williams, Penny
Whitfield, Mericia
Nicolet, Pascale
Brown, Colin
Hollis, John
Arnold, Dave
Pepper, Tim
机构
[1] Oxford Brookes Univ, Pond Conservat, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
[2] Cent Sci Lab, York YO41 1LZ, N Yorkshire, England
[3] Cranfield Univ, Bedford MK45 4DT, England
[4] Cambridge Environm Assessments, Cambridge CB3 8NN, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
invertebrate; macrophyte; catchment; landscape; pesticide; risk assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2006.11.013
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This study analysed information from national and regional datasets gathered in Great Britain describing the occurrence of aquatic macroinvertebrates and macrophytes in ponds, ditches, streams, rivers and lakes, across 12 agricultural landscape classes and a 13th class comprising non-agricultural land. The study found major differences in the composition of the invertebrate faunas of running and still water. River and stream assemblages had a relatively high proportion of species (20-40%) in groups believed to be sensitive to pesticides (mayflies, stoneflies, amphipod crustaceans). The proportion of these taxa also varied across the landscape with greater numbers of pesticide- sensitive species present in streams in more acid landscape classes. Ponds, in contrast, were dominated by water beetles and water bugs and supported fewer sensitive taxa (ca. 5% of the species present). The proportion of the fauna made up by these two taxonomic groups in ponds varied little between landscape classes. Ditches were intermediate between ponds and streams in both taxonomic composition and their variability across landscape class. Invertebrate species richness and rarity values were highest in rivers and ponds with fewer species in streams and ditches. Ponds typically supported more uncommon invertebrate species than other waterbody types. Plant assemblage data showed that, except for lakes, wetland landscape types (fenlands and valleys) were generally richer in species, with more uncommon taxa, than other landscapes. Ditch floras were often outstanding in these areas. The study findings have applications and implications in areas such as the development of environmentally valid mesocosm studies and for the creation of realistic scenarios in probabilistic risk assessment. (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 148
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], LOWLAND POND SURVEY
  • [2] Barr CJ., 1993, COUNTRYSIDE SURVEY 1, V2
  • [3] The importance of palaeolimnology to lake restoration
    Battarbee, RW
    [J]. HYDROBIOLOGIA, 1999, 395 (0) : 149 - 159
  • [4] Whole-system estimates of nitrification and nitrate uptake in streams of the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest
    Bernhardt, ES
    Hall, RO
    Likens, GE
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS, 2002, 5 (05) : 419 - 430
  • [5] 15 years of pond assessment in Britain: results and lessons learned from the work of Pond Conservation
    Biggs, J
    Williams, P
    Whitfield, M
    Nicolet, P
    Weatherby, A
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2005, 15 (06) : 693 - 714
  • [6] Boyle TP, 1997, ECOL APPL, V7, P1099
  • [7] Morphological and physico-chemical properties of British aquatic habitats potentially exposed to pesticides
    Brown, CD
    Turner, N
    Hollis, J
    Bellamy, P
    Biggs, J
    Williams, P
    Arnold, D
    Pepper, T
    Maund, S
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 113 (1-4) : 307 - 319
  • [8] CAMPBELL PJ, 1999, P OECD EC SETAC HARA
  • [9] TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT PONDS - AN ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTS OF DRYING OUT ON THE CONSERVATION VALUE OF AQUATIC MACROINVERTEBRATE COMMUNITIES
    COLLINSON, NH
    BIGGS, J
    CORFIELD, A
    HODSON, MJ
    WALKER, D
    WHITFIELD, M
    WILLIAMS, PJ
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1995, 74 (02) : 125 - 133
  • [10] CLASSIFICATION OF WATER BEETLE ASSEMBLAGES IN ARABLE FENLAND AND RANKING OF SITES IN RELATION TO CONSERVATION VALUE
    FOSTER, GN
    FOSTER, AP
    EYRE, MD
    BILTON, DT
    [J]. FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 1989, 22 (03) : 343 - 354