Cotton response to seasonal patterns of flower removal .1. Yield and fiber quality

被引:32
作者
Jones, MA
Wells, R
Guthrie, DS
机构
[1] N CAROLINA STATE UNIV,DEPT CROP SCI,RALEIGH,NC 27695
[2] DELTA RES & EXT CTR,STONEVILLE,MS 38776
[3] STONEVILLE PEDIGREE SEED,STONEVILLE,MS 38776
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600030019x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield and quality can be affected by altered fruiting patterns related to the abscission of fruiting forms. This field study quantified the effects of Bower removal during various stages of reproductive development on subsequent yield development, boil development, and fiber properties. Effects of early-, mid-, and late-season Bower loss on cotton reproductive development was determined. Various Bower removal treatments were imposed on two cultivars at Clayton, NC, during 1991 and 1992. Early Bower removal treatments (3rd week and earlier) delayed bell development, but no significant reduction in yield was found at season's end. Later Bower removals (4th week and later) significantly reduced total fiber yields (13-33%) compared with early-season removals (1st, 2nd, and Ist through 3rd week) and no removal. Boll weight was positively correlated with fiber properties and was related to the amount of competition among developing bells. The largest bells resulted from treatments that had the largest negative effect on yield. Micronaire was the only fiber variable affected by Bower removal, with increased values associated with later removal. Data indicate that late-season Bower losses (4th week and later) are the most injurious to yield, with significant yield reductions occurring from even the least severe, late-season removal treatment of 6th week and later flowers. Early loss (3rd week and earlier) of fruit can be tolerated if the season allows sufficient time for compensatory reproductive growth and if further losses due to plant stress or insect damage are controlled.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 638
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
BACHELER JS, 1995, AG417 NC COOP EXT SE, P102
[2]  
BACHELER JS, 1991, P BELTW COTT PROD RE, P615
[3]  
BONNER C, 1992, COTTON PHYSL TODAY, V3, P1
[4]  
EHLIG CF, 1973, CROP SCI, V13, P168, DOI 10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300020006x
[5]   ABSCISSION OF COTTON FLORAL BUDS AND BOLLS AS INFLUENCED BY FACTORS AFFECTING PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND RESPIRATION [J].
GUINN, G .
CROP SCIENCE, 1974, 14 (02) :291-293
[6]  
GUINN G, 1982, USDA TECH B, V1672, P1
[7]   COTTON BOLL RETENTION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO LINT YIELD [J].
HEITHOLT, JJ .
CROP SCIENCE, 1993, 33 (03) :486-490
[8]   FRUITING EFFICIENCY IN COTTON - BOLL SIZE AND BOLL SET PERCENTAGE [J].
JENKINS, JN ;
MCCARTY, JC ;
PARROTT, WL .
CROP SCIENCE, 1990, 30 (04) :857-860
[9]   Cotton response to seasonal patterns of flower removal .2. Growth and dry matter allocation [J].
Jones, MA ;
Wells, R ;
Guthrie, DS .
CROP SCIENCE, 1996, 36 (03) :639-645
[10]   EFFECT OF EARLY SEASON SQUARE REMOVAL ON 3 LEAF TYPES OF COTTON [J].
KENNEDY, CW ;
SMITH, WC ;
JONES, JE .
CROP SCIENCE, 1986, 26 (01) :139-145