Pilot study of a unique film dressing for the treatment of donor site wounds

被引:6
作者
Himel, HN
Ratliff, CR
Baruch, LD
Rodeheaver, GT
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Med Ctr, Dept Plast Surg, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Med Ctr, Dept Enterostomal Therapy, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Med Ctr, Dept Occupat Therapy, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & REHABILITATION | 1998年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00004630-199801000-00014
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The clinical benefits of using the VENTEX Wound Dressing System (VWDS) (The Kendall Co.) in the management of donor site wounds were evaluated in this pilot study involving 10 informed and consenting patients. The study was a prospective, randomized, controlled study in which one donor site wound was managed with VWDS, and the other donor site wound on the same patient was managed by our standard of care, which involved the use of Xeroform gauze (The Kendall Co.). Each donor site wound was independently assessed daily for pain, rate of reepithelialization, adverse reactions, and ease of dressing use while patients were hospitalized. Quality of scar was assessed during regularly scheduled follow-up visits. The use of VWDS eliminated donor site pain and accelerated reepithelialization compared with Xeroform Saute. There were no adverse reactions associated with the use of VWDS. In contrast, there were two cases of suspected infection at the donor sites treated with Xeroform gauze. The VWDS was more complicated to apply and use compared with Xeroform gauze. There were no differences observed in scar quality of donor sites treated with these dressings.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 65
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF SYNTHETIC ADHESIVE MOISTURE VAPOR PERMEABLE AND FINE MESH GAUZE DRESSINGS FOR SPLIT-THICKNESS SKIN-GRAFT DONOR SITES [J].
BARNETT, A ;
BERKOWITZ, RL ;
MILLS, R ;
VISTNES, LM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1983, 145 (03) :379-381
[2]  
Birdsell D C, 1979, Ann Plast Surg, V2, P535, DOI 10.1097/00000637-197906000-00015
[3]  
Brady S C, 1980, Ann Plast Surg, V5, P238, DOI 10.1097/00000637-198009000-00013
[4]  
CARR DB, 1992, AHCPR PUB, P48
[5]   USE OF A SEMIPERMEABLE POLYURETHANE MEMBRANE AS A DRESSING FOR SPLIT-SKIN GRAFT DONOR SITES [J].
DINNER, MI ;
PETERS, CR ;
SHERER, J .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1979, 64 (01) :112-114
[6]  
JAMES JH, 1975, BRIT J PLAST SURG, V28, P107, DOI 10.1016/0007-1226(75)90169-1
[7]   POLY(ETHER URETHANE) WOUND COVERING WITH HIGH WATER-VAPOR PERMEABILITY COMPARED WITH CONVENTIONAL TULLE GRAS ON SPLIT-SKIN DONOR SITES [J].
JONKMAN, MF ;
BRUIN, P ;
PENNINGS, AJ ;
COENEN, JMFH ;
KLASEN, HJ .
BURNS, 1989, 15 (04) :211-216
[8]   AN IMPROVED METHOD OF WOUND MANAGEMENT FOR PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS [J].
LOBE, TE ;
ANDERSON, GF ;
KING, DR ;
BOLES, ET .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1980, 15 (06) :886-889
[9]   OPTIMAL WOUND-HEALING UNDER OP-SITE DRESSING [J].
RAMIREZ, OM ;
GRANICK, MS ;
FUTRELL, JW .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1984, 73 (03) :474-475
[10]  
RICHMOND ID, 1986, BR J PLAST SURG, V39, P516