Responses to opposed directions of motion: Continuum or independent mechanisms?

被引:21
作者
Raymond, J [1 ]
Braddick, O [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV LONDON UNIV COLL,DEPT PSYCHOL,LONDON WC1E 6BT,ENGLAND
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
motion perception; motion opponency; adaptation;
D O I
10.1016/0042-6989(95)00241-3
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Opponency between opposite directions of motion is a characteristic of many models of movement detection and is commonly invoked in explanations of the motion after-effect, If detection of opposite directions is mediated by a single mechanism, then a single, smooth psychometric function for the discrimination of global direction in random-dot kinematograms should be found as a function of the percent of directional coherence of dots in the display, ranging from 100% coherence leftwards through 0% coherence to 100% coherence rightwards, Moreover, after rightward motion adaptation, a single psychometric function should still be observed if adaptation affects the perceptual system prior to opponent interactions. If, however, leftward and rightward detectors operate independently, then the slopes of the leftward and rightward halves of the function may differ, particularly after unidirectional adaptation. We measured the probability of a ''rightward'' direction response for nine values of motion coherence for five observers with and without prior rightward motion adaptation. Although a smooth psychometric function was found without motion adaptation, after adaptation, the rightward half of the psychometric function was flattened whereas the leftward half remained unchanged, Such results indicate that movement direction analysers operate in a non-opponent manner. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1931 / 1937
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   SPATIOTEMPORAL ENERGY MODELS FOR THE PERCEPTION OF MOTION [J].
ADELSON, EH ;
BERGEN, JR .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1985, 2 (02) :284-299
[2]   MASKING OF MOTION BY BROAD-BAND AND FILTERED DIRECTIONAL NOISE [J].
BALL, K ;
SEKULER, R .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1979, 26 (03) :206-214
[3]   EVIDENCE FOR A PHYSIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION OF WATERFALL PHENOMENON AND FIGURAL AFTER-EFFECTS [J].
BARLOW, HB ;
HILL, RM .
NATURE, 1963, 200 (491) :1345-&
[4]   MODULATION OF THE MOTION AFTEREFFECT BY SELECTIVE ATTENTION [J].
CHAUDHURI, A .
NATURE, 1990, 344 (6261) :60-62
[5]   EYE-MOVEMENTS AND THE MOTION AFTEREFFECT - ALTERNATIVES TO THE INDUCED MOTION HYPOTHESIS [J].
CHAUDHURI, A .
VISION RESEARCH, 1991, 31 (09) :1639-1645
[6]   REDUCTION OR DISAPPEARANCE OF VISUAL AFTER EFFECT OF MOVEMENT IN ABSENCE OF PATTERNED SURROUND [J].
DAY, RH ;
STRELOW, E .
NATURE, 1971, 230 (5288) :55-&
[7]   ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE ON THE VISUAL-MOTION AFTEREFFECT [J].
HIRIS, E ;
BLAKE, R .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1992, 89 (19) :9025-9028
[8]   ADAPTATION ALTERS PERCEIVED DIRECTION OF MOTION [J].
LEVINSON, E ;
SEKULER, R .
VISION RESEARCH, 1976, 16 (07) :779-+
[10]   AFTEREFFECT OF TRACKING EYE-MOVEMENTS [J].
MORGAN, MJ ;
WARD, RM ;
BRUSSELL, EM .
PERCEPTION, 1976, 5 (03) :309-317