Assessing functional diversity in marine benthic ecosystems: a comparison of approaches

被引:318
作者
Bremner, J [1 ]
Rogers, SI
Frid, CLJ
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Marine Sci & Technol, Dove Marine Lab, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE30 4PZ, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Ctr Environm Fisheries & Aquaculture Sci, Lowestoft Lab, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, Suffolk, England
关键词
ecosystem functioning; biological traits; relative taxon composition; trophic groups; megabenthos;
D O I
10.3354/meps254011
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Two methods traditionally employed to investigate functional diversity in marine benthic ecosystems are relative taxon composition analysis, which interprets changes in the distribution of taxa in terms of the characteristics they exhibit, and trophic group analysis, which investigates differences in feeding mechanisms between assemblages. An alternative approach, biological traits analysis, considers a range of biological traits expressed by organisms to assess how functioning varies between assemblages. This study compares biological traits analysis to the relative taxon composition and trophic group approaches. Biological trait scores were assigned to a range of epibenthic invertebrate taxa from the southern North Sea and eastern English Channel and differences in the relative proportions of these traits were investigated using multivariate methods. The traits important in differentiating stations were attachment, flexibility, body form, mobility, feeding method and life habit. Such assemblages were spatially heterogeneous and there was no obvious distinction between different geographical sectors. This contrasted with the results of the relative taxon composition approach, which showed broad patterns in assemblage distribution in the eastern English Channel and southern North Sea. The biological traits approach provided information on a larger variety of ecological functions than the other techniques and revealed very different relationships between assemblages. It highlighted a greater diversity of assemblage types and was resistant to large-scale biogeographic variations Therefore, it is potentially more useful than the traditional approaches for assessing ecosystem functioning on both large and small scales in benthic environments.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 25
页数:15
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Auster Peter J., 1996, Reviews in Fisheries Science, V4, P185
[2]   A long-term study of the recovery of the macrozoobenthos on large defaunated plots on a tidal flat in the Wadden Sea [J].
Beukema, JJ ;
Flach, EC ;
Dekker, R ;
Starink, M .
JOURNAL OF SEA RESEARCH, 1999, 42 (03) :235-254
[3]   The role of scallop-dredge disturbance in long-term changes in Irish Sea benthic communities: a re-analysis of an historical dataset [J].
Bradshaw, C ;
Veale, LO ;
Brand, AR .
JOURNAL OF SEA RESEARCH, 2002, 47 (02) :161-184
[4]  
BREMNER J, 2003, AQUAT ECOSYST HLTH M, V6
[5]   The role of commercial digging of mudflats as an agent for change of infaunal intertidal populations [J].
Brown, B ;
Wilson, WH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY, 1997, 218 (01) :49-61
[6]   Small-scale mapping of sea-bed assemblages in the eastern English Channel using sidescan sonar and remote sampling techniques [J].
Brown, CJ ;
Cooper, KM ;
Meadows, WJ ;
Limpenny, DS ;
Rees, HL .
ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2002, 54 (02) :263-278
[7]   Spatial changes in sublittoral soft-bottom polychaete assemblages due to river inputs and sewage discharges [J].
Cardell, MJ ;
Sardà, R ;
Romero, J .
ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1999, 20 (04) :343-351
[8]   Knowledge representation using fuzzy coded variables: An example based on the use of Syrphidae (Insecta, Diptera) in the assessment of riverine wetlands [J].
Castella, E ;
Speight, MCD .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1996, 85 (01) :13-25
[9]  
Charvet S, 1998, ARCH HYDROBIOL, V142, P415
[10]   Traits of benthic macroinvertebrates in semi-natural French streams: an initial application to biomonitoring in Europe [J].
Charvet, S ;
Statzner, B ;
Usseglio-Polatera, P ;
Dumont, B .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2000, 43 (02) :277-296