Meta-analysis of the comparative efficacy and safety of pitavastatin and atorvastatin in patients with dyslipidaemia

被引:21
作者
Poolsup, N. [1 ]
Suksomboon, N. [2 ]
Wongyaowarat, K. [1 ]
Rungkanchananon, B. [1 ]
Niyomrat, P. [1 ]
Kongsuwan, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Silpakorn Univ, Dept Pharm, Fac Pharm, Nakhon Pathom 73000, Thailand
[2] Mahidol Univ, Fac Pharm, Dept Pharm, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
关键词
atorvastatin; dyslipidaemia; lipid profiles; meta-analysis; pitavastatin; DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA DRUG INTERVENTION; ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; OPEN-LABEL; DIABETES-MELLITUS; JAPAN ASSESSMENT; KOREAN PATIENTS; STATIN THERAPY; HEART-DISEASE; RISK-FACTORS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2710.2011.01274.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
What is known and Objective: Pitavastatin is the latest available statin. It has been shown to be effective in the treatment of dyslipidaemia. This meta-analysis was aimed at evaluating the effects of pitavastatin on lipid profiles in patients with dyslipidaemia compared with atorvastatin. Methods: Clinical trials were identified through electronic searches (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EBM review, and the Cochrane Library) up to January 2011 and historical searches of relevant articles. Studies were included in the meta-analysis if they were (i) randomized controlled trials that evaluated pitavastatin at the recommended dose vs. atorvastatin in patients with dyslipidaemia, (ii) lasting at least 6 weeks, (iii) reporting total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, HDL-C or triglyceride (TG) levels and (iv) published in English. Treatment effect was estimated with the mean difference in the per cent changes in lipid profiles from baseline to final assessment between pitavastatin and atorvastatin. Results: Seven trials involving 1529 patients were included. Pitavastatin reduced LDL-C level as effectively as atorvastatin (mean difference 0.97%, 95% CI) 0.48% to 2.42%). The reductions in TC and TG levels were also comparable between the two drugs. The mean differences were 1.22% (95% CI) 0.55% to 2.99%) and 2.3% (95% CI) 1.06% to 5.65%), respectively. However, HDL-C levels increased significantly more with pitavastatin than with atorvastatin (mean difference 1.78%, 95% CI 0.20-3.36%, P = 0.03). What is new and Conclusions: Pitavastatin was as effective as atorvastatin in lowering LDL-C, TC and TG levels. Pitavastatin was marginally superior to atorvastatin in increasing HDLC levels.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 172
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], LIV PIT TABL 1 MG 2
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins
    Baigent, C
    Keech, A
    Kearney, PM
    Blackwell, L
    Buck, G
    Pollicino, C
    Kirby, A
    Sourjina, T
    Peto, R
    Collins, R
    Simes, J
    [J]. LANCET, 2005, 366 (9493) : 1267 - 1278
  • [3] Treating patients with documented atherosclerosis to national cholesterol education program-recommended low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol goals with atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin and simvastatin
    Brown, AS
    Bakker-Arkema, RG
    Yellen, L
    Henley, RW
    Guthrie, R
    Campbell, CF
    Koren, M
    Woo, W
    McLain, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 32 (03) : 665 - 672
  • [4] The benefits of statins in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Brugts, J. J.
    Yetgin, T.
    Hoeks, S. E.
    Gotto, A. M.
    Shepherd, J.
    Westendorp, R. G. J.
    de Craen, A. J. M.
    Knopp, R. H.
    Nakamura, H.
    Ridker, P.
    van Domburg, R.
    Deckers, J. W.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 339 : 36
  • [5] Pitavastatin compared with atorvastatin in primary hypercholesterolemia or combined dyslipidemia
    Budinski, Dragos
    Arneson, Valerie
    Hounslow, Neil
    Gratsiansky, Nikolai
    [J]. CLINICAL LIPIDOLOGY, 2009, 4 (03) : 291 - 302
  • [6] METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    DERSIMONIAN, R
    LAIRD, N
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03): : 177 - 188
  • [7] Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
    Egger, M
    Smith, GD
    Schneider, M
    Minder, C
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109): : 629 - 634
  • [8] Gotto AM, 2002, AM J MED, V112, p10s
  • [9] Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Final Report
    Grundy, SM
    Becker, D
    Clark, LT
    Cooper, RS
    Denke, MA
    Howard, WJ
    Hunninghake, DB
    Illingworth, R
    Luepker, RV
    McBride, P
    McKenney, JM
    Pasternak, RC
    Stone, NJ
    Van Horn, L
    Brewer, HB
    Cleeman, JI
    Ernst, ND
    Gordon, D
    Levy, D
    Rifkind, B
    Rossouw, JE
    Savage, P
    Haffner, SM
    Orloff, DG
    Proschan, MA
    Schwartz, JS
    Sempos, CT
    Shero, ST
    Murray, EZ
    Keller, SA
    Jehle, AJ
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (25) : 3143 - 3421
  • [10] Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
    Higgins, JPT
    Thompson, SG
    Deeks, JJ
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414): : 557 - 560