The role of esophageal pH monitoring in symptomatic patients on PPI therapy

被引:151
作者
Charbel, S
Khandwala, F
Vaezi, MF
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Gastroenterol, Ctr Swallowing & Esophageal Disorders, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Hepatol, Ctr Swallowing & Esophageal Disorders, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41210.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Ambulatory pH monitoring while on therapy is often recommended in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients with continued symptoms. However, to date, little data exist to justify this indication. AIM: To assess the role of pH monitoring in symptomatic patients despite aggressive therapy with typical or extra esophageal GERD. METHODS: Retrospective review of 2,291 ambulatory pH tracings (1999-2003) identified subgroup of studies performed on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Patients with prior fundoplication or Barrett's esophagus were excluded. Patients grouped on predominant presenting GERD symptoms: typical (heartburn and regurgitation) or extra esophageal (chest pain. cough, hoarseness, sore throat, shortness of breath, asthma). The distribution of abnormal pH parameters in each group calculated and univariate analyses assessed the probability of abnormal pH in each group. Abnormal cutoff, values traditionally used in clinical practice and more stringent cutoff values used to determine distribution of abnormality as a function of cutoff values. RESULTS: A total of 250 patients (mean age 54.3 yrs, 59% female) underwent pH monitoring on either daily (b.i.d.) or twice daily (q.d.) on PPI therapy: 115 (46%) with extra esophageal and 135 (54%) with typical GERD symptoms. Extra esophageal GERD patients were more likely to undergo pH monitoring on b.i.d. PPIs (OR = 2.7; 95% CI = 1.6-4.4; p < 0.01). 52 (93%) of typical and 74 (99%) of extra esophageal GERD patients on b.i.d. PPIs tested normal. The odds of a normal pH value's were 11 times higher for patients on b.i.d. PPIs (OR = 11.4; 95% CI = 4.3-30.1, p < 0.01) than those on q.d. PPIs. CONCLUSIONS: 1) The likelihood of an abnormal esophageal pH for symptomatic GERD patients on b.i.d. PPI is very small. 2) In this group of patients failing b.i.d. PPIs causes other than GERD should be sought.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 289
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
DeVault K R, 1995, Arch Intern Med, V155, P2165
[2]  
Ergun GA, 1996, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V91, P1077
[3]   24-HOUR PH MONITORING IN SYMPTOMATIC PATIENTS WITHOUT EROSIVE ESOPHAGITIS WHO DID NOT RESPOND TO ANTIREFLUX TREATMENT [J].
FASS, R ;
MACKEL, C ;
SAMPLINER, RE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1994, 19 (02) :97-99
[4]  
*GALL ORG, 1998, GALL SURV HEARTB AM
[5]   The prevalence of hypopharynx findings associated with gastroesophageal reflux in normal volunteers [J].
Hicks, DM ;
Ours, TM ;
Abelson, TI ;
Vaezi, MF ;
Richter, JE .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2002, 16 (04) :564-579
[6]   CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY OF OMEPRAZOLE [J].
HOWDEN, CW .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1991, 20 (01) :38-49
[7]   PREVALENCE OF SYMPTOMS SUGGESTIVE OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE IN AN ADULT-POPULATION [J].
ISOLAURI, J ;
LAIPPALA, P .
ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 1995, 27 (01) :67-70
[8]   Clinical esophageal pH recording: A technical review for practice guideline development [J].
Kahrilas, PJ ;
Quigley, EMM .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 110 (06) :1982-1996
[9]  
Katzka DA, 1996, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V91, P2110
[10]   LONG-TERM TREATMENT WITH OMEPRAZOLE FOR REFRACTORY REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS - EFFICACY AND SAFETY [J].
KLINKENBERGKNOL, EC ;
FESTEN, HPM ;
JANSEN, JBMJ ;
LAMERS, CBHW ;
NELIS, F ;
SNEL, P ;
LUCKERS, A ;
DEKKERS, CPM ;
HAVU, N ;
MEUWISSEN, M .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 121 (03) :161-167