Concordance trees, concordance factors, and the exploration of reticulate genealogy

被引:148
作者
Baum, David A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Bot, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
concordance; consensus; genealogical discordance; phylogeny; reticulate evolution; taxonomy;
D O I
10.1002/tax.562013
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Reticulate evolution, whether due to lateral gene transfer, introgression, incomplete lineage sorting, or hybrid speciation, is a ubiquitous phenomenon, yet systematists have few tools for analyzing and summarizing the resulting genealogical discordance. Here I argue that a primary concordance tree, a tree built from clades that are true of a plurality of the genome, provides a useful summary of the dominant phylogenetic history for a group of organisms. Residual historical signals can also be extracted in the form of secondary, tertiary, etc. concordance trees, which are built from clades that are present in the genome but contradict clades on the primary concordance tree. Clades on concordance trees can be annotated with their concordance factor (CF), the proportion of the genome for which the clade is true. Concordance trees can potentially be estimated either from population histories or from multilocus molecular datasets. In the latter case one can use the recently developed Bayesian concordance analysis to obtain point estimates and credibility intervals on CF's. I argue that the concepts of concordance trees and concordance factors inform the debate on how to integrate information from multiple independent datasets and help clarify the nature of the boundary between reticulate and divergent genealogy.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 426
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Ané C, 2007, MOL BIOL EVOL, V24, P412
[2]  
Avise J.C., 1990, Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, V7, P45
[3]   Phylogenetics and the origin of species [J].
Avise, JC ;
Wollenberg, K .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1997, 94 (15) :7748-7755
[4]   Do orthologous gene phylogenies really support tree-thinking? [J].
Bapteste, E ;
Susko, E ;
Leigh, J ;
MacLeod, D ;
Charlebois, RL ;
Doolittle, WF .
BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2005, 5 (1)
[5]   AGAINST CONSENSUS [J].
BARRETT, M ;
DONOGHUE, MJ ;
SOBER, E .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1991, 40 (04) :486-493
[6]  
BAUM DA, 1995, MONOG SYST BOTAN, V53, P289
[7]   PARTITIONING AND COMBINING DATA IN PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS [J].
BULL, JJ ;
HUELSENBECK, JP ;
CUNNINGHAM, CW ;
SWOFFORD, DL ;
WADDELL, PJ .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 1993, 42 (03) :384-397
[8]  
Cronn R, 2003, EVOLUTION, V57, P2475, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01493.x
[9]   SEPARATE VERSUS COMBINED ANALYSIS OF PHYLOGENETIC EVIDENCE [J].
DEQUEIROZ, A ;
DONOGHUE, MJ ;
KIM, J .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1995, 26 :657-681
[10]   GENE TREES AND SPECIES TREES - MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS AS ONE-CHARACTER TAXONOMY [J].
DOYLE, JJ .
SYSTEMATIC BOTANY, 1992, 17 (01) :144-163