Design and validation of the Quantum Mechanics Conceptual Survey

被引:78
作者
McKagan, S. B. [1 ,2 ]
Perkins, K. K. [3 ]
Wieman, C. E. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, JILA, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] NIST, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Phys, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[4] Univ British Columbia, Dept Phys, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH | 2010年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词
ENERGY;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020121
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The Quantum Mechanics Conceptual Survey (QMCS) is a 12-question survey of students' conceptual understanding of quantum mechanics. It is intended to be used to measure the relative effectiveness of different instructional methods in modern physics courses. In this paper, we describe the design and validation of the survey, a process that included observations of students, a review of previous literature and textbooks and syllabi, faculty and student interviews, and statistical analysis. We also discuss issues in the development of specific questions, which may be useful both for instructors who wish to use the QMCS in their classes and for researchers who wish to conduct further research of student understanding of quantum mechanics. The QMCS has been most thoroughly tested in, and is most appropriate for assessment of (as a posttest only), sophomore=level modern physics courses. We also describe testing with students in junior quantum courses and graduate quantum courses, from which we conclude that the QMCS may be appropriate for assessing junior quantum courses, but is not appropriate for assessing graduate courses. One surprising result of our faculty interviews is a lack of faculty consensus on what topics should be taught in modern physics, which has made designing a test that is valued by a majority of physics faculty more difficult than expected.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   New instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey [J].
Adams, W. K. ;
Perkins, K. K. ;
Podolefsky, N. S. ;
Dubson, M. ;
Finkelstein, N. D. ;
Wieman, C. E. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2006, 2 (01)
[2]  
ADAMS WK, INT J SCI E IN PRESS
[3]  
AMBROSE B, 1999, THESIS U WASHINGTON
[4]  
AMBROSE BS, 2005, 2004 PHYS ED RES C P
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, THESIS OHIO STATE U
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1978, An Introduction to Quantum Physics
[7]  
BAO L, 1999, THESIS U MARYLAND
[8]   TESTING STUDENT INTERPRETATION OF KINEMATICS GRAPHS [J].
BEICHNER, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1994, 62 (08) :750-762
[9]   Graduate quantum mechanics reform [J].
Carr, L. D. ;
McKagan, S. B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2009, 77 (04) :308-319
[10]   Testing the development of student conceptual and visualization understanding in quantum mechanics through the undergraduate career [J].
Cataloglu, E ;
Robinett, RW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2002, 70 (03) :238-251