The relative contribution of outcome domains in the total economic benefit of addiction interventions: a review of first findings

被引:85
作者
McCollister, KE
French, MT
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth D93, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Hlth Serv Res Ctr, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[3] Univ Miami, Dept Sociol, Miami, FL 33152 USA
关键词
addiction treatment; benefit-cost analyses; economic benefits; economic evaluation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00541.x
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims This paper provides a focused summary of the relative contribution of addiction intervention outcomes to total economic benefit, based upon a compilation of published economic studies from the United States. Design The relevant literature was searched extensively, and 11 economic studies were selected for review. Setting The selected addiction interventions address both alcohol use/abuse and illicit drug use/abuse and represent various treatment modalities, including a brief physician intervention and long-term residential programs. Participants Study participants included community-based drug users, pregnant and/or parenting women, problem drinkers, and criminal offenders. Measurements These studies estimated the economic benefits of an addiction intervention(s) in terms of one or more of the following outcome domains: criminal activity, health services utilization, employment earnings, and expenditures on illicit drugs and alcohol. Findings The primary finding of this review was that avoided criminal activity was the greatest economic benefit of addiction interventions and contributed more, as a separate outcome domain, to the total economic benefit of addiction interventions than any other outcome domain. Reduced utilization of health care services was also a noteworthy economic benefit of addiction interventions. Conclusions This study provides a detailed exposition of economic benefits estimation and highlights the potential impact of individual outcomes, thus providing a useful resource for substance abuse researchers and administrators as they design and evaluate future interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:1647 / 1659
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Consequences and costs of closing a publicly funded methadone maintenance clinic [J].
Alexandre, PK ;
Salomé, HJ ;
French, MT ;
Rivers, JE ;
McCoy, CB .
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2002, 83 (02) :519-536
[2]  
*AM MED ASS, 1999, PHYS FEE SCHED WASH
[3]  
American Hospital Association, 2000, HOSP STAT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Evaluating recovery services: The California Drug and Alcohol Treatment Assessment (CALDATA) general report
[5]  
[Anonymous], EC COSTS ALCOHOL DRU
[6]  
Aos Steve., 2001, The comparative costs and benefits of programs to reduce crime
[7]   The cost-effectiveness of buprenorphine maintenance therapy for opiate addiction in the United States [J].
Barnett, PG ;
Zaric, GS ;
Brandeau, ML .
ADDICTION, 2001, 96 (09) :1267-1278
[8]  
Cartwright William S., 2000, J Ment Health Policy Econ, V3, P11, DOI 10.1002/1099-176X(200003)3:1<11::AID-MHP66>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-0
[10]   Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of drug abuse treatment services [J].
Cartwright, WS .
EVALUATION REVIEW, 1998, 22 (05) :609-636