Development and testing of an automated approach to protein docking

被引:136
作者
Tovchigrechko, A [1 ]
Vakser, IA [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Bioinformat Lab, Dept Appl Math & Stat, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
CAPRI; GRAMM; protein modeling; molecular recognition; energy landscape;
D O I
10.1002/prot.20573
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A new version of GRAMM was applied to Targets 14, 18, and 19 in CAPRI Round 5. The predictions were generated without manual intervention. Ten top-ranked matches for each target were submitted. The docking was performed by a rigid-body procedure with a smoothed potential function to accommodate conformational changes. The first stage was a global search on a fine grid with a projection of a smoothed Lennard-Jones potential. The top predictions from the first stage were subjected to the conjugate gradient minimization with the same smoothed potential. The resulting local minima were reranked according to the weighted sum of Lennard-Jones potential, pairwise residue-residue statistical preferences, cluster occupancy, and the degree of the evolutionary conservation of the predicted interface. For Targets 14 and 18, the conformation of the complex was predicted with root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of the ligand interface atoms 0.68 A and 1.88 A correspondingly. For Target 19, the interface areas on both proteins were correctly predicted. The performance of the procedure was also analyzed on the benchmark of bound-unbound protein complexes. The results show that, on average, conformations of only 3 side-chains need to be optimized during docking of unbound structures before the backbone changes become a limiting factor. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 301
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   A protein-protein docking benchmark [J].
Chen, R ;
Mintseris, J ;
Janin, J ;
Weng, ZP .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 2003, 52 (01) :88-91
[2]  
Glaser F, 2001, PROTEINS, V43, P89, DOI 10.1002/1097-0134(20010501)43:2<89::AID-PROT1021>3.3.CO
[3]  
2-8
[4]   ConSurf: Identification of Functional Regions in Proteins by Surface-Mapping of Phylogenetic Information [J].
Glaser, F ;
Pupko, T ;
Paz, I ;
Bell, RE ;
Bechor-Shental, D ;
Martz, E ;
Ben-Tal, N .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 19 (01) :163-164
[5]   Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions [J].
Halperin, I ;
Ma, BY ;
Wolfson, H ;
Nussinov, R .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2002, 47 (04) :409-443
[6]   The role of geometric complementarity in secondary structure packing: A systematic docking study [J].
Jiang, SL ;
Tovchigrechko, A ;
Vakser, IA .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2003, 12 (08) :1646-1651
[7]   MOLECULAR-SURFACE RECOGNITION - DETERMINATION OF GEOMETRIC FIT BETWEEN PROTEINS AND THEIR LIGANDS BY CORRELATION TECHNIQUES [J].
KATCHALSKIKATZIR, E ;
SHARIV, I ;
EISENSTEIN, M ;
FRIESEM, AA ;
AFLALO, C ;
VAKSER, IA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1992, 89 (06) :2195-2199
[8]   Protein-protein interactions: Hot spots and structurally conserved residues often locate in complemented pockets that pre-organized in the unbound states: Implications for docking [J].
Li, X ;
Keskin, O ;
Ma, BY ;
Nussinov, R ;
Liang, J .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2004, 344 (03) :781-795
[9]  
MARSHALL GR, 2005, PROTEOMICS PROTEIN P
[10]   Anchor residues in protein-protein interactions [J].
Rajamani, D ;
Thiel, S ;
Vajda, S ;
Camacho, CJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (31) :11287-11292