Proving WATFLOOD: modelling the nonlinearities of hydrologic response to storm intensities

被引:15
作者
Cranmer, AJ
Kouwen, N [1 ]
Mousavi, SF
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Civil Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd, Thornhill, ON L3T 7N4, Canada
[3] Isfahan Univ Technol, Coll Agr, Esfahan, Iran
关键词
hydrology; watershed model; flood forecasting; hydrological modelling; model validation; unit hydrograph; nonlinear response;
D O I
10.1139/cjce-28-5-837
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper examines the effects of modelling the nonlinearities of hydrologic response to various storm intensities. Radar rainfall data, remotely sensed land use and land cover data, measured streamflows, and meteorological data were incorporated into the distributed flood forecasting model WATFLOOD to synthesize runoff hydrographs for three significant warm weather rainfall events occurring in 1995. The watershed selected for study was the 288 km(2) Duffins Creek drainage basin in southern Ontario. The effects of scaling radar rainfall amounts to match regional storm intensities on the synthesized streamflow hydrographs were examined. Computations and analysis were performed in agreement with widely accepted hydrologic principles and assumptions. The observed and synthesized hydrographs were compared using the unit hydrograph method. The observed and composite unit hydrographs matched extremely well in terms of shape, timing, and peak flow magnitude. These results indicated that WATFLOOD is capable of accurately modelling the nonlinear rainfall-runoff processes for increasing rainfall intensities with respect to peak flow, basin lag, and time to peak flow. However, the arbitrariness of assessing the effective rainfall and base-flow separation for the unit hydrograph method can lead to uncertainties in computing peak flow magnitudes. The grid element size and number and the drainage areas above streamflow gauges are of critical importance to the accuracy of the model.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 855
页数:19
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
BORAH DK, 1995, ASCE WATER RESOURCES, V2
[2]  
Bras R.L., 1990, INTRO HYDROLOGIC SCI
[3]  
CARONI E, 1986, SCALE PROBLEMS HYDRO, P19
[4]   ACCURACY OF RAINFALL ESTIMATES BY RADAR .3. APPLICATION FOR SHORT-TERM FLOOD FORECASTING [J].
COLLIER, CG ;
KNOWLES, JM .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1986, 83 (3-4) :237-249
[5]  
DINGMAN SL, 1994, PHYSICAL HYDROLOGY
[6]  
Dunne T., 1978, WATER ENV PLANNING
[7]   Space-time scale sensitivity of the Sacramento model to radar-gage precipitation inputs [J].
Finnerty, BD ;
Smith, MB ;
Seo, DJ ;
Koren, V ;
Moglen, GE .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1997, 203 (1-4) :21-38
[8]  
GARLAND AG, 1986, THESIS U WATERLOO WA
[9]  
Gray D.M, 1973, Handbook on the Principles of Hydrology: With Special Emphasis Directed to Canadian Conditions in the Discussions, Applications, and Presentation of Data
[10]   GROUPED RESPONSE UNITS FOR DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGIC MODELING [J].
KOUWEN, N ;
SOULIS, ED ;
PIETRONIRO, A ;
DONALD, J ;
HARRINGTON, RA .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1993, 119 (03) :289-305